By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

London Mayor seeks new London Bridge

London Mayor, Boris Johnson is to renew plans to create a new habitable bridge across the Thames, according to weekend media reports

The Sunday Times reports that early plans being drawn up by Anthony Brown, Johnson’s policy advisor are being modelled on designs by Antoine Grumbach, the French architects who won a competition to design a habitable bridge held by the Royal Academy in 1996.

The plan will see the construction of a new crossing, between Waterloo and Blackfriars bridges complete with shops, cafes and homes in the manner of the original London Bridge or a 21st century Ponte Vecchio.

It is being backed by the business group, London First. The designs show the bridge would be suspended from twin 35-storey towers on the north side, containing luxury flats with views over the city. On the south side, a greenhouse over the Thames would contain tropical trees and plants.

The overall cost of the project is currently estimated at £80 million.

In 2000, the AJ reported how the English Heritage fiercely opposed any plans, saying the Thames is ‘an open space which belongs to everyone in London. The river is not a development site and should not be walled off.’

Grumbach was joint winner of the Royal Academy Living Bridge scheme along with Zaha Hadid. Grumbach however emerged as the ‘people’s choice’ with more than 37 per cent of those visiting the RA ‘Bridging the City’ exhibition saying it was the favourite of the seven shortlisted.

Old London Bridge, 17th century

Readers' comments (2)

  • The reason medievel bridges had buildings on them was because it offered easy waste disposal, natural ventilation and limited exposure to plague. None of these are much of a risk these days. I am confident that a life-cycle energy analysis of this construction over something similar on land would prove the project ingorent of sustainable architecture.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • I have just read about this in the guardian newspaper & now here in this journal. On some occasions I agree with Boris Johnson, but not with this plan. I have to ask - "what is the point of this bridge?" What the guardian says, plus the comment above makes more sense . For me, I find what New York is planning/doing with their old, out of use railway lines much more positive and inspiring. I like the romance behind the idea of the bridge, but the plan does not sound quite right to me.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters