By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Localism: Tories to open development floodgates on NIMBY Councils

Developers will be allowed to build ‘what they like, where they like’ if councils fail to give permission for sufficient new housing schemes, a Conservative MP has said

John Howell, Parliamentary Private Secretary to Minister for Decentralisation Greg Clark, warned that if councils failed to plan for new development, it would be assumed that they had a ‘completely permissive planning system’.

As a result, he said a developer could build ‘what they like, where they like and when they like’, as long as they meet new national planning standards that are being worked on alongside the Localism Bill.

He stressed that the Government’s new planning system aimed to lead to more development, not less development.

Speaking at a seminar organised by the British Property Federation, he said: ‘I think that is an extremely good incentive for councils, when we have got waiting lists for housing and a community that doesn’t want to build anything - I cannot see how that would meet any future sustainability test.’

He added that the coalition’s presumption in favour of sustainable development would be a ‘golden thread’ running through the new planning system.

His comments were welcomed by the British Property Federation, which had expressed concerns that a move away from centralised targets to giving local authorities more power, could lead to fewer developments being granted planning permission.

Liz Peace, chief executive of the British Property Federation, said: ‘The property industry’s greatest fear was that the localism agenda would lead to greater nimbyism.

‘John’s comments have gone some way to easing these concerns with a clear emphasis on localism being used as a vehicle to drive growth and development rather than encouraging communities to opt out, effectively putting a leash on economic growth.’

It is estimated that the UK currently faces a shortage of around one million properties, and 232,000 new homes need to be built each year until 2033 to keep pace with rising demand.

But the number of properties built in 2009, the latest full year for which figures are available, sank to its lowest level for peacetime since 1923, with just 118,000 homes completed.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Increased demand for housing and pressure from the Coalition Government on so called ‘Nimby’ Local Authorities to build more homes or face decentralisation seems a logical and reasonable solution, if you are a Tori that. The idea of letting developers build what they want where they want, is just plain Bonkers!. Once again this government is demonstrating that it has failed to understand the real problems faced by Local Authorities, and are shooting from hip coming up with ideas that just have not been thought through in a logical and scientific manner, and appears to be based on advice from developers blaming ‘Nimby’ councils for failing to build more homes.

    Since when did developers become professional experts in planning, architecture, engineering, ecology, and anthropology? It is easy to say build more housing because we need it, but there are wider considerations that need to be made before that can take place. More home also equals more roads, car parks, schools, hospitals, trains, buses, air traffic, leisure facilities, public libraries, public parks, to name a few not to mentioned the ecological impact of increasing these key elements all of which need to be considered in detail by the Councils as well as accepting cuts in funding from the government and cuts to existing facilities. Easy Peasy Hey!

    If developers had their way today the lake district would have been over developed with housing, but thankfully that did not happen and we can enjoy what is recognised as a national treasure.

    Yes we do need more housing, but allowing developers to build what they want were they want is not the solution. It can and must only be achieved by involving the right professionals and acknowledging that wider investment not cuts are needed to support this need.

    Architectural Assistant,
    London

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters