By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Localism Bill: urgent clarification needed

The profession has been left in the dark over the government’s proposals for planning reform following the long-awaited publication of the Localism Bill

While the bill reiterates the coalition government’s drive to give local people more influence over development in their communities, key details relating to the proposed National Planning Policy Framework remain absent, as does the much-anticipated explanation of the ‘Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development’.

The framework and its sustainable development cornerstone are set to replace the current system of Planning Policy Statements (PPS).

Philip Singleton, chair of the RIBA Planning Group, said: ‘The bill focuses a lot on “sustainable development” [but there is] no real definition as to what this means [and there is] no real detail yet on how neighbourhood planning will work in practice.’

The RIBA has been heavily consulted on the framework, which it is understood will govern developments in the 80 per cent of local authorities yet to establish Local Development Frameworks.

Under the bill, communities will be free to prohibit certain development types, but will also be empowered to build without planning permission where there is agreement at local and neighbourhood levels. The government hopes this will boost house building in rural areas.

But architects slammed the bill for further contributing to a ‘planning law vacuum’ which has existed since communities secretary Eric Pickles in June abolished Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) and threw house building into limbo.

Philip Waddy of West Waddy ADP added: ‘I very much regret the government’s decision to scrap RSS targets six months before they introduced the Localism Bill. We still await the National Planning Framework and a clear definition of what the government mean by that.’

The Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) pleaded with ministers to urgently clarify key points of the legislation. Ann Skippers, RTPI president, said: ‘[There] is still great uncertainty about key planning reforms, the issue of financial incentives and no implementation plan, all of which are likely to have an unwanted impact in stalling much needed economic recovery, because no one knows how the planning system will work.’

However, PRP chairman Andy von Bradsky welcomed the opportunities the bill could bring. He said: ‘Communities will need help and assistance to guide them, in order to ensure they can deliver their vision for the areas in which they live.’

 

Key points: The Localism Bill

Key points: The Localism Bill

 

Readers' comments (2)

  • So will communities be funded to get the help and assistance they need (Andy von Bradsky's comment) or will the poorest paid profession be expected, if good design is to be a factor, to put in the time for nothing?

    Looks like a NIMBY's charter.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • It is understood private companies (i.e. Tesco etc) would be permitted to help with the running costs for neighbourhood groups. However with or without this support there will likely be 'pro-bono opportunities' for architects.

  • John Kellett

    "pro-bono opportunities for architects"?
    Working for free isn't an opportunity it is exploitation, unless there are enforceable requirements for the architect to be paid for the work at a later date at a sensible fee.
    I fail to understand why we should provide our services for free in order for somebody else to make a profit. It's hard enough as it is with ridiculously low fee levels for the work we are required to provide.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters