By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


In pictures: London architects dominate shortlist for Olympic kiosk contest

[FIRST LOOK] These are the five shortlisted schemes in the Architecture Foundation’s competition to design a series of kiosks for Meridian Square, Stratford – the gateway to the Olympic Park

The permanent structures will sit outside Stratford Station in east London ‘before, during and after’ the 2012 Olympic Games.

London-based practices Moxon Architects, 42 Architects, Bell Phillips Architects and Studio Octopi all made the shortlist, along with US firm Ginseng Chicken Architecture.

Each practice now receives £1,500 to develop its design to RIBA stage D. The winner, announced next month, will supervise the project through to RIBA stage L.

The competition organiser’s view

It is testament to the intense international interest in London’s Olympic plans that this competition attracted nearly 90 entries, from places as diverse as Chile, Finland and Nigeria. It’s interesting that, although our exhibited longlist retains a high level of international diversity, four out of the five shortlisted practices are not only British, but based in London. This result, revealed after anonymous judging, suggests that these architects benefited from close personal research of the site.

It’s a complex setting, and one that requires sensitivity to a range of users and neighbouring buildings, both existing and planned. Given the dominance of other sculptural elements in the immediate vicinity, the jury was looking for proposals that drew strength from elegant, calm utility, rather than spectacular objects.

Anonymity is essential to our open competition process, allowing projects’ strengths to shine through, without prejudice of authorship. That said, although the jury shortlisted schemes on their intrinsic merits, we will now seek to appoint a practice which inspires confidence at interview that its approach is both robust and suitably flexible.

The pragmatics of cost and delivery are necessarily going to come into focus, given that the client is working to a limited budget and a date that simply can’t be pushed back. However, the client values design quality and fresh thinking, and I feel confident that we will see these priorities carried through to the selection of the winner next month.

Sarah Ichioka is director of the Architecture Foundation


The competition longlist

42 Architects (UK)

AU Studio (UK)

Bell Phillips Architects (UK)

Don Orike Architects and
HD3 Architecture (UK)

EW Taller De Arquitectura (Chile)

Feix & Merlin (UK)

Ginseng Chicken (USA)


Ja Architecture Studio and
Aleph-Bau (Canada)

Labra (Finland)

Moxon Architects (UK)

NorthSeven (UK)

Studio Octopi (UK)

Tsuruta Architects (UK)

Readers' comments (3)

  • Don't like any of them

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Names more interesting and funnier that the proposals

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Its always disappointing not to be shortlisted but even more so when you don't even get a notification from the organisers in this case The Architecture Foundation, and have to read it in the press. If they had any sense or value of the amount of work put into the submissions they could easily notify all those unsuccessful with one email. Even the RIBA, for all their failings do that!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.


Which scheme should win?

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters