Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

House in Lincolnshire by Adrian Watson

  • 23 Comments

[FIRST LOOK + IMAGES + DRAWINGS] Adrian Watson of Hopkins Architects is undertaking a solo project to build an artist’s house and studio in Lincolnshire

The scheme, which received planning permission in spring 2007, looks out on the site of Sleaford Castle.

The three bedrooms on the ground floor sit on the southern edge of the building, while wet areas and storage are located on the north. The main living areas are on the first floor to provide better views.

Towards the rear of the site, approval has been given for a painting studio which will be completed at a later date.

Conceptually, Watson has conceived the house as an ‘abstract interpretation of the house as type’, but the proposal is free of detail other than the flush-pointed brickwork. The scheme’s windows will be externally flush-fitted to reduce the relief on the facade, but the glazing has been intentionally proportioned to appear ‘naive’.

Internally, the structural brick will be lime-washed and the building’s portal frame and steel ridge beam in the roof will be left exposed. Watson intends to contrast the house’s robust aesthetic with birch-faced plywood stairs and uses heavy brown felt drapes to separate the entrance lobby from the ground floor hall.

The scheme boasts a number of green features including; an air source heat pump will provide spatial and water heating through under floor heating and a submerged rain-water harvesting tank will supplement demand for toilet flushing, irrigation and a washing machine. Watson is currently looking at using photovoltaic slates on the south facing roof.

The house is intended to be completed in summer 2010.

  • 23 Comments

Related files

Readers' comments (23)

  • This psuedo intellectualisation of a house that a developer would be embarrassed about makes the profession look a bit silly. What is the relevance other, other than name dropping, that Watson is from Hopkins?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Crash! Crass! Crap!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Medias are now only interested in having names to publish.
    Wether it's to do with commercial, artistic or now architecture fields, you can't get published in a book or in a mag. if you haven't got your entry card.
    "Welcome to the club".
    David.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a TEDIOUS builing... (judging from the single image presented without downloading)

    "Conceptually, Watson has conceived the house as an ‘abstract interpretation of the house as type’, but the proposal is free of detail other than the flush-pointed brickwork. The scheme’s windows will be externally flush-fitted to reduce the relief on the facade, but the glazing has been intentionally proportioned to appear ‘naive’."

    I'd interpret that as "cheap and boring"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Watson has conceived the house as an ‘abstract interpretation of the house as type’, but the proposal is free of detail other than the flush-pointed brickwork. The scheme’s windows will be externally flush-fitted to reduce the relief on the facade, but the glazing has been intentionally proportioned to appear ‘naive’".
    At least taxi's will know where to drop you off when you live near the 'ugliest building in Lincolnshire please mate'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Would someone please tell whoever created those PDF files how to do them much more efficiently - there's hardly anything on them but the file sizes are enormous!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having now downloaded the various drawings I'm finding nothing that I can give any praise to. This REALLY looks like a first year student's attempt at a house but it has very little to comment it at all - in any context.

    Apart from the Dining Room widow the house fails to address the rear of the plot at all - and where's the details for the Artist's Studio?

    Only the front door to get in and out of the house - no other way of connecting inside to outside - no balcony space.

    "The scheme boasts a number of green features" - but manages to do without a draught lobby merely using "heavy brown felt drapes ". Why not provide a door!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For "comment" read "commend"...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think that this building looks rather good - potentially. I'm not sure that it's important whether the architect works for Hopkins or not - it's probably just incidental.

    I know this area well, and I applaud the architect for a building which, once finished, will be subtle and refreshingly prosaic (and I don't mean that in a negative way). The trouble is most observers won't get it (see comments above) and it's not helped by absurd comments from the architect pretending that he's re-invented something (this isn't an abstract interpretation of anything I'm afraid)

    Of course the beauty, and I do think that this could be a beautiful building, will lie in the execution of the (lack of?) detail. A plain, flush pointed wall can be amazing, but the bricks, mortar, reveals and frames must be absolutely perfect....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think its pure no a nice a scheme, n that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.