By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Future of ARB again under scrutiny

The future of the ARB is again in doubt after the government advised its board members to prepare for a periodic review

Last Thursday Richard Harral, principal architect for the Building Regulations and Standards Division at the Department for Communities and Local Government, attended the ARB board meeting to introduce board members to the process for the government’s periodic review of the body.

The spotlight on the quango, which survived a previous ‘bonfire’ of nearly 192 public bodies three years ago, will begin in February 2014 with a preliminary investigation into the purpose of the ARB and how its objectives are delivered expected to last up to three months.

This will be followed by an assessment of the organisation’s governance and accountability.

Harral confirmed that the government would consider abolishing the ARB should the periodic review find the body was not performing properly and said: ‘This process is to make sure things are fit for purpose and that they deliver.’

The ARB board also voted to approve recommendations by the DCLG to increase the tenure of board members from three years to four years, which the government department said would bring the ARB into line with other ‘Arm’s length bodies’, and would save money and resources on elections.

We are not prejudging the outcome of the periodic review

Beatrice Fraenkel, chair of the ARB, said: ‘We are not prejudging the outcome of the periodic review. In 2010 there was a review of all the regulatory bodies, which led to the bonfire of the quangos – and we were kept. All bodies live with [the threat of abolition] and rightly so – we need to be trusted and the profession needs to be confident with their regulatory body.’

In a separate item, the ARB board discussed approaching the DCLG about obtaining charitable status for the body. The advantages of charitable status would mean that the ARB would no longer pay corporation tax, and would pay no more than 20 per cent of normal business rates on the buildings they occupy. The ARB will now explore whether or not it fits the criteria to receive charitable status.

Readers' comments (1)

  • In my quote above it should also include the point I made that the PUBLIC must be confident in the quality of all their regulators, wether the regulator in regulating their water, their health provider, their banks, or in this case their Architects....

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters