By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Ex-Lighthouse boss weighs in: 'George Sq should become urban laboratory'

The former director of the Lighthouse Stuart MacDonald calls for mass public participation in any new vision for Glasgow’s George Square

‘Unable firstly to find a winner for Glasgow’s George Square competition, then obliged by procurement rules to do so, followed by an announcement scrapping the project because of public criticism about the lack of consultation, council humiliation is complete. Against that degrading backdrop and even although the council has indicated a ‘modest’ facelift for the square, possibly with a more radical re-design later, there is still the opportunity for democracy to prevail. You have to see the George Square climb-down as part of a wider trend. Changing economic behaviours and the rise of user-participation has revived interest in public realm.

Aberdeen’s recent debacle over the cack-handed approach to its divisive City Gardens Project, and now George Square, highlight a demand for more citizen involvement – for greater democracy. With the demise of the High Street the only thing in our cities that offers belonging and identity are the few civic spaces left. What politicians don’t get is that people want to be part of the story – a new narrative with the need to embrace meaningful participation that goes beyond mere consultation.

What politicians don’t get is that people want to be part of the story

The clue lies in the City itself. Even though the council envisages a light touch makeover for the Square, it nonetheless presents the opportunity to re-think public engagement; reappraising Glasgow as a people-centred place and rediscovering its capacity for citizen involvement in large-scale, public consultation events. There was a time not so long ago when Glaswegians, political leaders and the architecture and design sector could come together and animate debate and activities focussed on issues of common concern. Securing the accolade of Glasgow UK City of Architecture and Design was predicated on this approach. The necessary capability is still here. Last year four young Glasgow practices represented Scotland at the Venice Architecture Biennale. What they showcased wasn’t buildings but community engagement, all based on experiences honed in Glasgow’s urban environment with local communities.

Going back to square one should mean recapturing the participatory ethos that was and could still be the hallmark of Glasgow design. People talk of George Square as the City’s ‘living room’. Why not exploit this theme by inviting users of the Square - young people, seniors, women, ethnic groups - indeed, whoever wants to participate, to work alongside architects, planners and designers to co-create amazing street furniture, picnic areas, meeting places, play furniture, temporary art installations, signage? The Commonwealth Games is as good a time as any. In preparation for this, the Square could become a vibrant urban laboratory taking participation to a new level with hundreds of people. As well as providing a template for doing things differently it could make Glasgow again world-leading in a field that was once its own. Chaotic maybe, but it is a significant and more transparent advance on polls, focus groups and referenda. It could also be great fun. 

Stuart MacDonald is the emeritus professor at Gray’s School of Art and was founding Director of the Lighthouse

Critical Dialogues: Scotland + Venice, an exhibition of the four Glasgow practices from the 2012 Venice Architecture Biennale opens at the Lighthouse 15 February.

 

 

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • Perhaps, before any more moves to start tinkering with George Square, it might be a good idea to repair the damage caused by gross neglect - and botched reinstatement after street excavations - of all the fine Caithness flag and Brazilian granite paving in the city centre. This was installed, with great fanfare, in a makeover associated with the 'City of Culture' and previous 'Glasgow's miles better' initiatives.
    There is also the question of the extensive city centre pavements that never 'got the treatment' and are spectacularly neglected, as well as the quite astonishingly squalid back streets in the city centre. And the more recent installation of pavement-blocking advertising panels further indicates a very real lack of civic integrity in favour of superficial gesture.
    'Public participation' will require wholesale reform of the city council, if it is to have any meaning.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters