By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Ex-architect falsified doctors’ notes

A disgraced former architect created bogus doctors’ letters to avoid attending trial over forged planning documents

Robert Lindsay produced two e-mails exempting him from court on medical grounds. Both documents however were revealed to be forgeries, Carlisle Crown Court heard.

Lindsay admitted four charges of forgery and one count of making a false representation. He asked the judge to ‘take into consideration’ two attempts to pervert the course of justice, according to the News & Star.

Judge Paul Batty QC said to Lindsay: ‘This is a very serious matter. You are a professional forger and you will be sentenced to a period of custody.’

‘The length of time of that custody I have yet to determine, but I will take into account your attempt to deceive this court earlier this week. The pre-sentence report will simply address the length of the sentence.’

Richard Lindsay lost his professional accreditation in 1998.

Readers' comments (1)

  • John Kellett

    Robert Lindsay is not an 'architect'. If not registered he could be an 'architectural consultant' or perhaps 'architectural designer'. The use of the word 'architect' is not relevant when the person concerned was evicted from the profession for fraud 12 years ago. The use of 'quotes' is also pointless!

    "Architectural consultant falsified doctors' notes" would be a more correct and helpful headline.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters