Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

David Taylor rejects Shard allegations

  • Comment

Regeneration big-hitter David Taylor has rejected allegations he lobbied John Prescott to approve the Renzo Piano-designed Shard skyscraper – and potentially earn himself a £1 million fee

According to the Mail on Sunday, Taylor – described by the paper as ‘a former special adviser and friend’ of the then-deputy prime minister – asked for the money from developer Sellar Property Group when Prescott rubberstamped the 87-storey scheme at London Bridge.

 It is alleged Taylor, also labelled by the Mail on Sunday as ‘Prescott’s former aide’, had a confidential ‘gentlemen’s agreement’ with millionaire Irvine Sellar to assist in getting approval from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and ‘use his wide contacts in government’.

However, Taylor told the AJ that, although he did speak to the Government Office for London, he had never lobbied ministers in a bid to green light the scheme.

 He said: ‘I don’t like lobbying – I never have and I never will be a lobbyist. The only time I spoke to Prescott about the Shard was to make sure we didn’t discuss it. ’

 The Mail on Sunday’s story emerged following a court case in Jersey between project backers Simon Halabi – now bankrupt – and Sellar. Halabi claimed he had not been consulted on the professional team, including Taylor, who had agreed to work as an adviser on a ‘risk basis’.

Hitting out at accusations his role was in any way clandestine, Taylor said: ‘If my involvement was secret why would I sit in the public inquiry? Sellar engaged me to restructure the process.’

Taylor, the brains behind the now-defunct Silvertown Quays project and the founder of English Partnerships, admitted he had not given evidence at the inquiry, but said: ‘I’m still glad I worked on the project. I make no apologies for that or for working at risk on a scheme that will become an outstanding landmark for London.’

Taylor maintains he never received the full £1 million fee, emphasising that he continued to work at an on-risk basis ‘60 per cent of the time’.

Sellar did not respond to enquiries about the matter.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.