By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


CABE rounds on PRP's Barnet scheme

CABE has raised concerns that PRP Architects’ huge housing-led plans for the Inglis Barracks development in North London may not fit into the surrounding area 

It is the second time within a month that CABE has hit the practice, following its criticism of PRP and Scott Brownrigg’s Kidbrooke, South London, masterplan Phase 2 on the Ferrier Estate site.

Having reviewed the Barnet plans, which include 2,174 new homes, a primary school, GP surgery and a district energy centre in Mill Hill East, CABE said it was not convinced the taller buildings in the scheme’s so-called ‘southern hub’ would ‘relate appropriately to the scale of the buildings outside the site’.

The watchdog’s design review panel went on to say it was unsure how the study of the barracks and the surrounding area had shaped PRP’s design of the development and that before any planning application was decided, the council should request sections to display the height and scale of the proposed buildings in relation to the scheme’s neighbours.

CABE also queried how successfully a community would develop when the school and other facilities in the southern half of the site were phased a ‘long way from, and some time after,‘ the phases to the north of the site

Click here to read the full design review.

In response, PRP said it was ‘happy’ to produce the section drawings requested, to illustrate the height and scale of its proposals in relation to the context. But it added that it was important to recognise that Mill Hill East station, adjacent to the application site, was likely to be brought forward for development as part of the adopted AAP; and the present proposals should be reviewed against what will be adjacent to the site in the future rather than what is actually there now.


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related images

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters