By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


BAA denies Terminal 5 subsidence reports

BAA has denied media reports that the Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners-designed Terminal 5 at Heathrow airport is structurally unsound

In a statement to the AJ, the authority said: ‘There are categorically no structural issues at Terminal 5, in fact the building is exceeding our expectations. Terminal 5 continues to deliver an outstanding passenger experience.

‘[The terminal] does not have any structural problem caused by subsidence.  Every building goes through a natural process of settling.  To suggest that means there is a problem with Terminal 5 is, therefore, quite simply wrong.’

The salvo follows media reports claiming the owners of the £4.3 billion terminal had admitted it is suffering from subsidence - or heave. The Telegraph said that BAA had confessed the foundations were rising, with floor tiles reportedly having to be repaired on the south side of the terminal. Similar reports appreared in The Mirror and Daily Mail.

Environmental campaigners Greenpeace has subsequently called for more information to be released about the subsistence problem before work commences on the planned sixth terminal, which will be located just 500 metres from T5.

Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners was unavailable for comment.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters