By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Architects named in human rights row

Abu Dhabi projects by Zaha Hadid and Jean Nouvel accused of ‘exploitation’ by human rights group

Zaha Hadid and Jean Nouvel are among architects singled out by US-based organisation Human Rights Watch for the ‘abuse and severe exploitation’ of construction labourers occurring on their projects at Abu Dhabi’s luxury Saadiyat Island development.

In an 80-page report published last week, entitled The Island of Happiness: Exploitation of Migrant Workers on Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, Human Rights Watch found that, despite slow improvements in timely payment of wages and labour conditions, abuses such as passport withholding and fines are still occurring.

Under government developer the Tourism Development and Investment Company (TDIC), Saadiyat Island (‘Happiness Island’ in Arabic) is being developed into a £17 billion tourism and cultural centre, comprising a Nouvel-designed Louvre, Foster + Partners’ Sheikh Zayed National Museum and Hadid’s Performing Arts Centre, all yet to be completed.

Human Rights Watch called on the architects, and institutions such as the Louvre, to obtain enforceable contractual guarantees that construction companies will protect workers’ fundamental human rights.

‘These international institutions need to show that they will not tolerate or benefit from the gross exploitation of these migrant workers,’ said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch.

Julian Carlson, a director at Pascall + Watson, which was recently appointed by Ateliers Jean Nouvel to work on the Louvre project, said: ‘We haven’t reached the stage yet where we engage with the construction industry, but we are committed to supporting our client in achieving equitable working conditions.’

A statement from Zaha Hadid Architects said: ‘We take the Human Rights Watch report very seriously… As a partner in the Abu Dhabi Performing Arts Centre project, Zaha Hadid Architects is confident the implementation of policies included in the TDIC CSR [Corporate Social Responsibility] Report 2009 address the issues raised by Human Rights Watch.’

In response to the report, TDIC issued a statement saying that the report ‘not only neglects TDIC’s policies, procedures and actions relating to worker welfare, but also makes misleading assertions and false assumptions’.

Meanwhile a spokesman for Foster + Partners said: ‘As architects appointed by TDIC for the Zayed National Museum, we fully support every effort that TDIC have outlined in their CSR Report, and indeed the considerable work they have already done to ensure the workers employed on all of their projects enjoy their core labour rights. 

‘In particular we were pleased that TDIC have established an in-house Department of Employment Practices Compliance - a step which we think will further protect workers on their projects.  TDIC have promised regular updates on their values in areas of sustanability, health and safety, labour practices and philanthropy and Foster + Partners are looking forward to working with them in order to acheive those values.

Correction: An earlier version of this post contained references to a project’s design architect, Gehry Partners, LLP. These references were made without having spoken to the practice and have been removed. We regret any misunderstanding.

Readers' comments (2)

  • If Im honest, I'm really a bit shocked about this, I really hope the architects involved will make sure their building process etc complies. It sounds like Norman Foster is doing the best right now (as read). It might be idealistic but I do find it a bit ironic that these buildings are Arts related as at least some of the time Artists spend their time making work about the human condition, so......?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Hardly a surprise, and about time too. What's more shocking is how signature architects are so busy with the power and glory that fundamental questions and the ethics of building environmental disasters can be simply dismissed. Here's another article on the vacousness that is Dubai,
    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-dark-side-of-dubai-1664368.html

    Its speaks for itself.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters