By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


ARB clampdown on insurance run-off cover looms

The Architects Registration Board (ARB) has spoken out about architects maintaining adequate indemnity insurance run-off cover after quitting practice

The move, which could spell the start of a clampdown, comes after ARB’s professional conduct committee fined Simon Finney from Wirral, Merseyside, £1,000 for unacceptable professional conduct.

Finney admitted that he did not have run-off cover for his practice, Finney, which was wound up in June 2008.

In finding him guilty of unacceptable professional conduct, the chairman of the Committee reiterated that a failure to maintain professional indemnity insurance run-off cover – sometimes called tail insurance – was a serious matter, which not only damaged the reputation of the profession but was unfair to those ‘more organised, practical and commercially-focused colleagues’, who undertake the expense of appropriate insurance. 

In a statement the ARB added: ‘We see the failure of any architect to ensure that there is proper PII cover not only during the period when they are in practice, but for the appropriate run-off period, therefore as a serious error of duty and breach of the Code and the requirements as to proper professional conduct.’

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters