Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Spot the architect: LSE student union contenders revealed

  • 6 Comments

The AJ can exclusively reveal the first images of the six shortlisted schemes in the competition for the London School of Economics’ (LSE) new £21.5 million students’ centre

The designs, submitted anonymously, include entries by Stirling Prize-winners David Chipperfield and Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios. They are joined in the final of the RIBA-organised competition by Ireland’s O’Donnell + Tuomey, Danish practice 3XN, Allford Hall Monaghan Morris and de Rijke Marsh Morgan.

A winner will be announced by the end of this month.

  • 6 Comments

Readers' comments (6)

Can you pick which scheme has been designed by which architect?

  • Scheme E must be Mr Chipperfield. And B could be those Danes 3XN. Not putting bets on it though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I reckon...

    A - AHMM
    B - 3XN
    C - Feilden Clegg Bradley
    D - O'Donell and Tuomey
    E - Chippo
    F - DRMM

    Is there a prize? A share of the winner's money perhaps?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • its not

    A - Chippo
    B - O'Donnell and Tuomey
    C - DRMM
    D - AHMM
    E - 3XN
    F - Feilden Clegg Bradley

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A - Allford Hall Monaghan Morris
    B - 3XN
    C – Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios
    D - Morris and de Rijke Marsh Morgan
    E – Chipperfield
    F- O’Donnell Tuomey

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yep, I reckon F is O'Donnell & Tuomey.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Architects seldom have to live around but not use the buildings they create. While looking modern and interesting on paper, a lot of their creations quickly become tacky eyesores in reality. I often feel that our modern monstrosities are arrogant personal statements by selfish architects. i.e. The Beetham tower in Manchester, the gherkin and so many others including the schemes in this competition. Perhaps they should be required to live in their creations before charging their fees.
    Architects should not have the right to dictate to everyone else what buildings should look like.
    They should rather be employed by the rest of us to design & build things that look elegant & will stand the test of time. After all, more people pay to visit old buildings than new ones. But what do I know, I'm just a taxpayer...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.