Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Contentious Chiswick House plans win lottery cash

  • Comment
The Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) has thrown its weight - and, more importantly, its cash - behind the vastly controversial plans to renovate Chiswick House and Gardens in west London.

The organisation has given its backing, and the promise of £7.9 million, to the project, which will give a thorough overhaul to the gardens, considered by some to be the home of landscape design.

The proposals will also see the refurbishment of the Grade I-listed house, the creation of some new parking facilities, a home for a semi-permanent function marquee and a new café, possibly by Michael Hopkins.

While all agree that both the house and gardens are in urgent need of a thorough refurbishment, the plans have triggered major controversy.

Both local campaigners, made up of residents, and the Georgian Group have hit out at the plans. They are concerned that the car parking will ruin part of the historic walled gardens and that both the café and the marquee will ruin the setting of the house.

But Carole Souter, HLF director, said the scheme had her complete backing. 'Chiswick House and Gardens is a hugely popular and much-used local landmark,' she said.

'This major boost from the Heritage Lottery Fund will not only help safeguard the future of these beautiful gardens but will also attract many more visitors and volunteers to enjoy them,' she added.

by Ed Dorrell

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.