By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Bogus architect slapped with £1,000 fine

A fraudulent attempt by a Cheshire-based man to register as an architect has been thwarted by the Architects Registration Board (ARB)

James Peter Hindley was found guilty by Westminster Magistrates’ Court of intentionally attempting to register as an architect with the ARB and of creating and falsifying official documents.

Hindley of the CAVE Architecture & Design based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire, submitted an application to register in January 2014. During the process Hindley produced ‘evidence’ of a Bachelor of Architecture (‘BArch’) he had received from Manchester Metropolitan University.

According to the board it ‘became apparent to ARB the documents he had submitted were false and that it was a deliberate attempt to become registered as an architect in the UK by fraudulent means’.

False registration is a criminal offence under section 7 of the Architects Act 1997, and one which ARB duly prosecuted at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 16 July 2014.

Hindley, who failed to attend the hearing, has been fined £1,000 – the maximum amount which could be imposed for the offence – and ordered to pay £2,079 in court costs. A victim surcharge of £100 was also imposed.

Karen Holmes, ARB’s Interim Registrar, said: ‘We have in place a robust process by which all applications for registration are carefully scrutinised to ensure that only those who are appropriately qualified are entered on to the register.’


Readers' comments (1)

  • I disagree that £1,000 is the maximum fine - isn't this is Fraud by False Representation?

    Whilst they may not have yet profited from the fraud, their is clear intent to break the law too and is not even slightly defensible as a mistake (as one might argue when they call themselves an Architect but are not).

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters