By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


BFLS Tower set for approval after controversial plans are revised

BFLS’s contentious ‘Dalston Green’ scheme has been recomended for planning approval following revisions which include an upgrade of Kingsland High Street station

Hackney’s planners have recommended the tower for approval at the next planning meeting on 7 March after changes to the project.

The alterations come after concerns were raised by local residents who described the project as an ‘eyesore.’ English Heritage and a number of local architects also voiced concerns, (see AJ 22.02,12), saying the tower did ‘not adequately respect the historic area’s character’.

New images released today by Rothas, the long-term freehold owners of the site, highlight the changes to Kingsland High Street which also includes a revised elevation to the street frontage on Kingsland High Street.

There is a proposed station upgrade, which includes doubling the number of Oyster readers, on-grade lift access from street level to the platforms, a new ticket hall and station frontage, public meeting space and visual improvements to the Kingsland High Street public realm.

A spokesperson for the developers Rothas said: ‘Following an extensive consultation, we strongly welcome Hackney’s recommendation for this highly sustainable landmark development. This recommendation shows that the plans match Hackney’s vision for bringing new jobs, homes and investment to Dalston.’

Readers' comments (1)

  • Forgive my cynicism but this seems to be standard operating procedure in Hackney - Publicising a heinously out of scale proposal with under-provision of affordable housing then, following "extensive consultation", announcing the section 106 infrastructure deal with the council, along with comprehensive changes to the angle from which the cgi is taken.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters