By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Corb your enthusiasm

Fans who celebrated Le Corbusier’s birthday on Thursday last week (6 October) may be saddened to learn old Corb came in for a bashing the very same day as part of a London School of Economics debate on architecture and happiness

Philosopher Roger Scruton, who debated against Centre for London director Ben Rogers, described Le Corbusier’s architecture as a ‘menace’, saying his vision of Chandigarh had ‘never been a home to anyone’ and was ‘a machine for dying in’.

But the worst insult he reserved for Reading. ‘Nowhere in human history has so much ugliness accumulated in so small a place.’ Equally bleak was Rogers’ argument. ‘Think about the object of architecture – a beautiful building. Will that actually contribute to the sum of human happiness? Grow up, of course it won’t.’

le Corbusier's Chandigarh

le Corbusier’s Chandigarh

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters