By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


ARB reformers may take retention fee battle all the way to court

The ARB Reform Group is considering taking the row over the recent increase in the retention fee to court.

While the group's plans have not been explicitly outlined yet, it seems likely this action will take the form of a judicial review.

The latest row between the reformers and the board's leadership centres on a small retention fee rise of £1.50.

The reform group - which won the lion's share of the vote in the last ballot standing on a ticket of paring back the ARB's work - believed they had defeated the rise two weeks ago by threatening to walk out and leave the board inquorate.

But just days later the vote was put to board members again, but this time by post. Reform group members argued that this move, which resulted in a nine-to-one result in favour of the rise, contradicted the Architects Act, and boycotted it.

However, new ARB registrar Alison Carr declared the vote acceptable last Friday and the retention rise therefore became board policy.

But now the reform group is threatening legal action. 'What we are saying is that because we are not voting the ballot of board members was inquorate,' reform group member George Oldham said.

'We will test the decision in law of [the board leadership's] attempt to enforce the rise,' he warned.

by Ed Dorrell

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters