By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Aedas fails to tempt contractor on Supreme Court scheme

Architectural giant Aedas has confessed it is struggling to find a contractor for its 'complex' Parliament House project in Edinburgh, Scotland.

The global practice is involved in the revamp of Scotland's Supreme Court, situated on Edinburgh's Royal Mile, but has been repeatedly snubbed by builders due to the complex and risky nature of the project.

According to Aedas architect Andrew Mackie, the problem lies with the building's listed status and the five-year time span. Contractors' heads are also being turned by the prospect of the 2012 Olympics, and even as far ahead as Glasgow's bid to host the Commonwealth Games.

Mackie said: 'It is an A-listed building and the project will have to take place over five years while the building stays operational. It means it will be particularly difficult work with all these added restrictions.'

The Scottish Courts Service (SCS), which owns the building, has had to re-advertise the tender due to the lack of interest, and there are concerns that the longer the project drags on, the less likely it is that builders will want to get involved.

Already worried by the delays and cost, the SCS froze the scheme in 2004 for a re-evaluation. However, despite the re-evaluation and the £35 million fee, contractors are still unforthcoming.

The Supreme Court has been the hub of the Scottish justice system since 1632. It is thought that the scheme's tight site may be another reason that contractors have been unforthcoming.

by Richard Vaughan

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters