By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


- While conservationists attack decision not to list Liverpool

The chairman of the Liverpool Preservation Trust has attacked Unesco's decision not to put Liverpool on its World Heritage 'in danger' list.

Wayne Colquhuon described Unesco's conclusion that 'the outstanding universal value of Liverpool's Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site is not threatened by the impact of new development' as a 'big disappointment'.

He said: 'The central core of the World Heritage Site is being eroded. The Three Graces at the pier head are being swamped by modern developments.

'It is civic vandalism,' added Colquhuon.

The reprieve means Liverpool joins Tower Bridge and Westminster, both of which learned yesterday (26 June) that they too would remain off the in danger list for at least another year.

Culture Minister David Lammy said: 'Much has been done to ensure that redevelopment respects Liverpool's magnificent cultural heritage, particularly through planning control based on a keener understanding of townscape characteristics and sense of place, and this will continue.'

Unesco's decision follows a visit to the city in October 2006, during which the impact of planning proposals - including 3XN's National Museum of Liverpool - was reviewed.

by Max Thompson

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters