Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Chris Medland's comments

  • Stop moaning, the Garden Bridge is fabulous

    Chris Medland's comment 19 May, 2015 9:48 am

    great designs solve problems. Pretty ideas that cost a lot of money and create more problems than they solve are not great designs.

    Today our tiny little practice (one-world design architects) will safeguard 60,000 trees by donating 150 acres of Sumatran forest to the rainforest trust for a very small sum- £330 - we would encourage everyone to do the same or more.

    The Rain Forest Trust has said that £175,000,000 would buy around 70,000,000 acres of virgin rain forest in places like Sumatra and Brazil- 70 Million Acres! at 400 trees/acre (low estimate) this kind of money is to be shockingly wasted on 270 odd small trees when it could safeguard a staggering 28,000,000,000 trees - that's 28 Billion trees•

    A single mature tree can absorb carbon dioxide at a rate of 22kg./year and release enough oxygen back into the atmosphere to support 2 people - this would be enough to offset the carbon for London - it could be the first carbon neutral city in the world..... someone needs a good shake and to be encouraged to take a look outside zone 1 for a reality check. Please donate to https://www.rainforesttrust.org/

  • Shortlisted practices reveal final designs for Helsinki Guggenheim

    Chris Medland's comment 23 April, 2015 9:37 am

    from the poll results I would hazard a guess that B is the UK entry!

  • Morrell: Garden Bridge challenge ‘only an annoyance’

    Chris Medland's comment 2 April, 2015 2:38 pm

    As a river crossing the final decision on permission here is made by the mayor of London. If the review does send the project back to the planning authority then this would mean that the existing decision by the mayor would no longer stand. This in turn would mean that even if Westminster passed a second planning application a further decision by a potentially different mayor would then be required. many of the mayoral candidates would not pass it and some have also stated that they would overturn the existing decision. The main issue with the tideway tunnel 'clash' is simply an increase in river traffic which will be carrying spoil - this is inconvenient but not a show stopper. Elsewhere the complications of political moves is influencing the decision makers. For instance I suspect that those who advocate the bridge are hoping that Boris either fails to become an MP or the conservatives win a good majority, ensuring Cameron remains PM. If Boris becomes an MP in May, and Cameron fails to get a majority, there is the potential of Boris becoming the leader of the conservatives and even PM. A new mayor will be elected this year, before the garden bridge starts on site, and they may overturn the existing decision - there is a real possibility that it will never happen.... Perhaps the rush to start construction is more to do with politics than any technical coordination with the Thames Tideway Tunnel?

  • It’s official: goodbye Code for Sustainable Homes

    Chris Medland's comment 30 March, 2015 12:06 pm

    The solution is to make the building regulations more stringent, i.e. the equivalent of Code 5, moving to Code 6 by say 2020.

  • It’s official: goodbye Code for Sustainable Homes

    Chris Medland's comment 30 March, 2015 9:58 am

    This is a real step backwards. Councils such as Woking require Code 5 for new developments, and rightly so. Statutory regulation compliance is the only tool we have as architects that cannot be value engineered out by developers. If Building Regs are only pushing for the equivalent of Code 4 then the volume developments will be designed to meet just that - hugely disappointing.

  • Shortlist revealed in Nine Elms bridge contest

    Chris Medland's comment 17 March, 2015 12:00 pm

    very nice, all but 1 are similar in design, i.e. suspension bridges - the exception being AL's which is a tied arch. The Thames is a designated helicopter route, I hope all of those vertical suspenders and suspension cables are well below the minimum flying height - this area of Battersea has an obvious and recent history in that regard

  • Revealed: all 74 schemes vying for new Nine Elms bridge

    Chris Medland's comment 23 February, 2015 3:06 pm

    the nine elms redevelopment, a new tube station, potentially 2 new bridges and a housing zone - exciting times for Battersea

  • Heatherwick’s Shoreham restaurant scrapped amid toilets row

    Chris Medland's comment 17 February, 2015 2:36 pm

    PS - the architectural world may love the Heatherwick café at Littlehampton but the locals call it the 'Rusty Poo'....

  • Heatherwick’s Shoreham restaurant scrapped amid toilets row

    Chris Medland's comment 17 February, 2015 12:07 pm

    the point is that the existing public toilets need to be replaced as well as provision for the café users. The council are right I this instance and its not their fault if the developers financial model doesn't stack up. Why don't the council build out the project themselves and lease the café to cover the costs and bring in a revenue...

  • Free to download: Carl Turner puts plans for floating home on website

    Chris Medland's comment 23 January, 2015 3:06 pm

    PII? Design responsibility? Different regulations in different countries etc - floating homes need planning permission too! so many questions...