By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Chris Medland's Comments

  • Comment on: Garden Bridge's £20m public loan to be repaid over 50 years

    Chris Medland's comment 5-Nov-2015 9:53 am

    they are going to have to sell a lot of t-shirts to pay back a £20,000,000 loan and maintain the bridge at a cost of £3.5m/annum. Clearly they will have to charge for entry.

  • Comment on: Public funding for Garden Bridge slashed by £20m

    Chris Medland's comment 3-Nov-2015 8:46 am

    Caroline Pidgeon must now be front runner for London Mayor... there are no other candidates that have a proven track record of being principled and diligent.

  • Comment on: Progress shots of Marks Barfield's Brighton i360 Tower released

    Chris Medland's comment 27-Oct-2015 10:43 am

    looks great. beautifully detailed

  • Comment on: TfL director contradicts Boris on Garden Bridge procurement

    Chris Medland's comment 23-Oct-2015 1:35 pm

    Boris Johnson is not just the mayor, he is also the chair of TfL....

  • Comment on: Hyde + Hyde's Swansea coast housing wins planning

    Chris Medland's comment 21-Oct-2015 3:42 pm

    very nice

  • Comment on: TfL's Garden Bridge probe slammed as a 'whitewash'

    Chris Medland's comment 29-Sep-2015 8:53 pm

    is any of this, or the other suspected actions in terms of funding, illegal?

  • Comment on: Anger as Zaha grilled on BBC Today Programme

    Chris Medland's comment 24-Sep-2015 11:22 am

    if you ask a serious question you should allow time to receive a serious answer.

  • Comment on: Jennings: 'People are tired of being duped by developers'

    Chris Medland's comment 25-Aug-2015 9:51 am

    Good points made. As tweeted by one-world design architects on July 29th 'With new media & immediate detailed info the days of PR machines and possibly contrived polls/ surveys are over'. I still contest that for at least £64,000,000 of our money we should have a public right of way - if not why not? The GBT simply don't answer.

  • Comment on: Libeskind’s Jerusalem pyramid gets go-ahead

    Chris Medland's comment 13-Aug-2015 1:08 pm


  • Comment on: Libeskind’s Jerusalem pyramid gets go-ahead

    Chris Medland's comment 13-Aug-2015 12:23 pm

    the way it lands on a straight sided base is really unconfortable

  • Comment on: Green light for Essex co-housing scheme

    Chris Medland's comment 8-Aug-2015 9:29 am

    good. beautiful drawings too... not a sketch up man with cap in sight

  • Comment on: Patel Taylor scoops planning for ‘twisting’ tower

    Chris Medland's comment 6-Aug-2015 11:02 am

    I have every confidence it will... thanks

  • Comment on: Patel Taylor scoops planning for ‘twisting’ tower

    Chris Medland's comment 6-Aug-2015 10:50 am

    Duncan - please see my note above yours. More info on our facebook page etc but in short the space for the landing of the bridge has been left at the request of wandsworth and the S106 agreement has Barratt installing the piles....

  • Comment on: Patel Taylor scoops planning for ‘twisting’ tower

    Chris Medland's comment 6-Aug-2015 10:41 am

    The proposal is to be built immediately adjacent to the new pedestrian and cycle river crossing (on the same site), The Diamond Jubilee Bridge- it will become a gateway building for Battersea. For a full update on the positive steps forward made by this and others developments please refer to our facebook page:

  • Comment on: Shuttleworth: 'The Garden Bridge makes a statement about London's creativity'

    Chris Medland's comment 5-Aug-2015 4:16 pm

    Both Ken and the Director from Arup are misunderstanding what some peoples objections are - its not about design - its much more important, its about democracy, openness and who owns the right to privatise a public space. Why doesn't the bridge have a public right of way? There is no reason to close it at night - lots of public London streets have trees and flower beds that need maintenance and the city is served by the best police force on the planet. Public rights of way can be temporarily closed under licence for 'private' fundraising events. There is no real need to stop cyclist either. The combination of the highway code, law of the land and common sense will do the job it does elsewhere on places like the Thames path that at times are only 2m wide and are shared spaces (with pedestrian priority) The whole thing is tail wagging dog that's why people don't like it - it has the feeling of an occupation of the space, a private invasion of the river rather than a welcome guest at the party on Thames. Yes you can build a bridge over our river, yes you can put some nice trees on it, and yes you can even have private events on it occasionally - but when we say you can (through normal council applications process) and we can use it all day and all night within the laws of the land.

  • Comment on: Kapoor's Orbit to be turned into £1m wonder-slide

    Chris Medland's comment 30-Jul-2015 2:11 pm

    I have checked my calendar - its not April 1st...

  • Comment on: Emmott: 'Londoners overwhelmingly want the Garden Bridge'

    Chris Medland's comment 29-Jul-2015 10:41 am

    If you repeat the corporate line enough times you are bound to start believing it eventually. There is clearly a bubble of billy bollocks wrapped firmly around the PR machine behind this. If it was the right thing to do it then why is a PR machine employed at all.

  • Comment on: Ian Ritchie: 'What problem does the Garden Bridge solve?'

    Chris Medland's comment 27-Jul-2015 9:48 am

    well said. completely agree

  • Comment on: Europe's 'largest green wall' completes on Warwick car park

    Chris Medland's comment 8-Jul-2015 12:24 pm

    one world design architects ethos and moto is ‘design that adds value’ – some mistake this as a purely financial endeavour. Not at all. From the outset one-world design architects has been focused on adding ecological, social and environmental value as a priority. This project, along with the Diamond Jubilee Bridge for instance, is an example of where, with the help of a great forward thinking client and design team, we have succeeded - that is the joy for me in this project

  • Comment on: Porritt: 'architects are failing to tackle climate change'

    Chris Medland's comment 2-Jul-2015 3:08 pm

    Couldn't agree more. However of course we are dependant on the commitment of clients because its their money we spend. We are also dependant on government policy as its within that framework and the parameter they set that the clients operate. We need the RIBA to be a stronger voice in pushing forward greater environmental standards and lobbying for improvements at government and statutory authority level. We also need the industry press to focus more on real sustainability issues, not green wash projects ( urban parsley) and we need to design buildings now for the climate of 20, 40 and 80 years time. I refer you below to our manifesto statement first issued 4 years ago - perhaps time for an update: 1 – The Challenge Constants and Change As we face the challenges brought about by the economic, political and social context of today, the effects of climate change will take greater prominence on future design. Global warming is real, its effects estimated and its consequences will be widespread and varied. Approximately 50% of all resources consumed on Earth are used in construction. Construction is reported to be the least sustainable industry in the world. It is about to go through the most dramatic period of change since the invention of steel framed buildings and the industrial revolution. This is not only because of the political commitments and the increased public acceptance of the need to be sustainable, but the buildings we design now need to be designed for the foreseeable effects of climate change. A new epoch will be recognisable in years to come, created by the need for architecture to respond to global warming and prepare our towns and cities for a new environment. The UK escapes the worst effects of climate change compared to many places; however the UK Met Office predicts that the south of England’s average day time temperature will be 9 degrees higher in the summer of 2080. Our future here will be hotter, we will have less predictable water supplies, more violent storms and we will have less reliable sources of fossil fuels. The procurement of buildings today needs to take all of these issues into account. Design solutions need to adapt to the effects of climate change whilst minimizing their contribution to the causes; design solutions need to be embedded within the form, construction and materials of all new buildings. Design now must allow us to maintain a good quality of the life without hindering future generation’s ability to provide the same for themselves. The challenge for the construction industry and Architects today, therefore, is how can we design for the long term to give people places that will serve them well through many times, changing technologies, and over many years in an earnest, considered and truly sustainable way? 2 – The Response Design Principles Sustainable development is defined in the Brundtland Report as ‘development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. This definition contains two key concepts, that of needs and limitations. The basic needs of all people, and the limitations reached by contemporary technology, social context and the environments ability to meet future and present needs. All definitions of sustainable development depict the world as an interconnected system: One world that is connected in space and connected in the sequence of time. Architecture, building and development is by its very nature a positive investment in our future. It is the undertaking of work to sustain or improve our future quality of life. Architects working today for the benefit of people in 25, 50, 80 years time and beyond. The timescales involved mean that our buildings need to be designed not only to ‘meet the needs of the present’, but will need to serve future generations. Given the evidence and predictions of how our environment is changing, a more adequate/appropriate definition of sustainable development might be, ‘development that meets the needs of the present and foreseeable future without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs’. This principle calls for designing and building focused not on short-term architectural awards, or acclamation , or even on building regulations or BREEAM standards, but to the best possible solution that is economically, socially and environmentally sustainable. This change in mindset is not about using low energy light bulbs, but rather about why electrically powered lighting is required at all. It is about asking difficult questions that generate a shift in our perception of the things we take for granted and the way in which our homes, offices and all buildings operate, look and are procured. The One-World view is that sustainability recognises the nexus linking the economy, society, and our environment. We have one world and the resources of one world only. Until such a time when resources from other worlds can viably be procured we need to base the design of everything on this brief. A one-world approach to design stipulates that we consume resources only at a rate at which they can be replenished and produce waste only at a rate at which it can be recycled. It requires that we deal with the relationships between all aspects of building habitation and use holistically rather than as individual elements in isolation. Architects now must seek out and support sustainable development opportunities and create solutions that offer both an environmentally sound and a high quality product. We will achieve this through understanding how things have been done before, learning the practical lessons of the past, and by staying ahead of the statutory regulations by meeting future standards today. We will use architectural tools to adapt, improve and craft existing and new buildings in a way that serves people to the best possible effect, without submitting to ego or seeking monument. Through clear thinking, not swayed by fashion or fads, we need to use intuitive approaches to address the challenges of regeneration that are fit for purpose, context and the future in a truly sustainable development.