Simon Carne's comments
Is it one storey too high? Dominating not respecting its neighbours, could more be placed below ground?
interesting to see Make's work in context of Foster's Gerkin. Teams on each sharing the same members and no doubt the shape justifications for one could equally be applied to the other?
Lucy's comments are so sensible but architects just can't resist the thrill of the chase. Also surprising to see who is on the panel of judges. How will their deliberations be recorded in the interests of transparency and openness?
At least there are a couple of 'relatively' small practices involved and so - good luck Marks Barfield.
The critical importance of regional transport in the City Region should not be underplayed. Felix rightly points out the scale and population of a South Wales City region, but it is one that is crying out for greater employment opportunities. Transport for the region as a whole is required. Having looked for example at numerous projects large and small across Wales and in particular in the south, my overall impression is that welsh enthusiasm and skill is often denied by the lack of the urbanist's vision for these independent towns and cities who jealously guard their identity, but miss opportunities to work together. By all means celebrate history, culture and individuality but share the proceeds and collaborate.
Louis Helman answers the brief, but then he doesn't need an introduction. Hannah Carding answers it with humour. Is the brief the key or will technical expertise win? They are lovely but for those taking on the larger scale it is difficult to see how the sketches show the different ways in which we make our houses, neighbourhoods and cities our own. It's a tough task for the judges.
BREEAM "excellent" fully glazed south facing building saved by CHP. Is that a suitable model? All those bike spaces and showers waiting for a good local cycling infrastructure.
One aspect not mentioned in the First Look article was the apparently generous floor plan areas. The 4 bed houses seem to be nearly 200m2, the one bed flats just over 93m2 and the 2 bed flats about 107m2. These if correct are considerably in excess of the London Housing Space Standards and recommendations in the RIBA's Case for Space campaign.
Richard Rogers inspired -like it Agnieskza
It is well worth re-reading Parker Morris. It addresses so much more than space standards. Many of the recommendations are of course past their sell-by date, but within the text there are many gems. I have in my copy highlighted many, here are few -
"It is important that these minimum space standards should not be taken as a maxima; they are nothing of the sort." Para 16
The adaptable house merits only one paragraph (29) but ends with the call. "We see the investigation of practical possibilities of doing it (adaptable housing) easily ....one of the most important lines of future research into the development of design and structure the sooner it is started the better"
"The over-riding concern in designing with the car in mind must be to design for the pedestrian to stay alive....."para 200
89 pages long, arguably too many words and not enough diagrams but excellent value at 4/- from HMSO. Time to publish again on the web with metric and costs updated for inflation?
Whilst having buildings as part of the backdrop to a World Heritage site is not in itself unacceptable, surely the issues are also quality of public realm, a cut back to reveal the entrance to Waterloo Station, lack of enclosure to the enlarged public realm and the unrelieved elevational treatment. Big buildings require more subtlety and interrogation before approval.