By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Robert Wakeham's Comments

  • Comment on: Fosters unveils designs for Russian headquarters

    Robert Wakeham's comment 14-Jul-2014 8:09 am

    As 'a powerful new symbol' for a copper manufacturer the choice of cladding material is rather surprising.

  • Comment on: City chief slams Pickles over 'ridiculous' Smithfield decision

    Robert Wakeham's comment 14-Jul-2014 8:06 am

    Mark Boleat doesn't seem to understand that greed doesn't always pay.

  • Comment on: 'New' Aedas eyes London mega-schemes

    Robert Wakeham's comment 9-Jul-2014 9:41 am

    Flashing photos of Chinese high rises as 'evidence of intent' in London might just be counter productive.

  • Comment on: Estuary Airport is 'huge financial and environmental risk'

    Robert Wakeham's comment 9-Jul-2014 9:33 am

    It's amazing how the prospect of Heathrow as juicy development land could entice Boris into promoting an enormous lemon.

  • Comment on: Pickles throws out John McAslan's Smithfield plans

    Robert Wakeham's comment 9-Jul-2014 9:27 am

    It's difficult to understand how this proposal could have gained the support of CABE, let alone English Heritage.

  • Comment on: Mecanoo completes Rabobank offices

    Robert Wakeham's comment 8-Jul-2014 9:21 am

    A design that depends, for external effect, on creating an open wedge shaped space beneath the building is really rather banal.

  • Comment on: Hawkins\Brown scoops planning for Southwark resi scheme

    Robert Wakeham's comment 7-Jul-2014 10:10 am

    'tenure blind' is what, exactly?

  • Comment on: Breaking news: Aedas splits

    Robert Wakeham's comment 7-Jul-2014 9:37 am

    Does the unlabelled photo of the largest development (hopefully in Southeast Asia rather than London) represent an actual project, or a vision of a nightmare future?

  • Comment on: Lochside lookout

    Robert Wakeham's comment 4-Jul-2014 8:35 am

    This looks great - in a tranquil setting - but is there a risk of rams, or stags, charging their own reflections?

  • Comment on: In the forest: The ‘house’ that £15k built

    Robert Wakeham's comment 4-Jul-2014 8:27 am

    Walter Segal would surely approve - but does it really need braces on every bay?

  • Comment on: Denton Corker Marshall wins planning for City office

    Robert Wakeham's comment 3-Jul-2014 9:09 am

    I think I prefer the existing building, this seems to be about stuffing the site to the absolute limit - and with demolition of a relatively modern building, how does this project score in the sustainability stakes? I can't help thinking that Denton Corker Marshall are capable of a great deal better than this.

  • Comment on: Heatherwick to help shape HS2 design legacy

    Robert Wakeham's comment 3-Jul-2014 8:59 am

    This might be all about HS2 but hopefully there'll be a quality of design 'dividend' that can inform future development of the railways - some recent design has been of patchy quality, for example the improvements to Newport station.

  • Comment on: Martyn Evans: ‘You’d have to be gaga to rip the heart out of Smithfield’

    Robert Wakeham's comment 1-Jul-2014 9:51 pm

    The credit rightly due to John McAslan for a fine development of Kings Cross Station risks being negated by this clumsy intervention at Smithfield.

  • Comment on: Boris accused of bias over Mount Pleasant overhaul

    Robert Wakeham's comment 1-Jul-2014 9:46 pm

    If Gillian Darley says the brief is wrong, Boris should climb down off his gilded bike and listen.

  • Comment on: Davies speech means Thames airport option is still on cards, claims Boris

    Robert Wakeham's comment 26-Jun-2014 10:04 pm

    Is it within Boris Johnson's gift to close Heathrow? - He's mayor of London, not England boss (yet); Heathrow serves a great deal more of the country than just London, and serves it far better than an airport down the Thames estuary ever could. To be perfectly cynical, property developers might call the shots in London, but they don't pull England's strings to the same extent.

  • Comment on: Hodder’s presidential agenda derailed by dysfunctional RIBA

    Robert Wakeham's comment 25-Jun-2014 9:39 am

    Interesting that John Assael is one of the trio, because he himself has (I'm sure unwittingly) dropped a clanger in his own practice information. As a board member of ARB, he should surely have realised that to describe all the directors of his practice as not only being registered architects but also being members of ARB, is really not on.

  • Comment on: Revival of Alsop's Supercity? Osborne unveils HS3 vision

    Robert Wakeham's comment 24-Jun-2014 9:56 am

    Some supercities creep up on us unannounced; for example, it takes no more time to travel between central Glasgow and central Edinburgh than it can take to go from Holborn to Canary Wharf. How much of the South East's economic success is down to a financial services sector so loosely regulated that it's costing the country (not just the South East) astronomic sums to rescue it, with every sign that mainland Europe could well start to make inroads on this business? George Osborne's pronouncements have to be seen in the light of rising disaffection in Northern England with the policies of the Department for Transport in denying the provision of adequate numbers of trains (rather like the situation in the Bristol / Bath area a year or two ago). Despite this shortfall, the DfT is overseeing the transfer of some of the best quality trains from Northern England to services out of Marylebone, and it's probably no coincidence that it's the Treasury minister, not the Transport minister, who's promising jam tomorrow. Many in the North of England compare their situation unfavourably with that in a devolved (let alone independent) Scotland, where improving train services isn't dependent on the vagaries of the DfT and the (frequently dead hand) of the Treasury.

  • Comment on: Fosters' partner hits out at 'lack of vision' over new Thames Estuary airport

    Robert Wakeham's comment 20-Jun-2014 10:49 am

    For 'benefits for the country' read 'benefits for London', because the proposed site would be less accessible to the rest of the country. There seems to be 'paucity of the interrogation of the opportunity' in the minds of Thomas and Johnson - unless, of course, they're entirely fixated on what's best for London and references to 'the rest of the country' are just a cynical gesture to public opinion. There is also the question of weather - I've been stuck in Schipol waiting half a day for the fog to clear at London City when flights to the other London airports were unaffected, so just how sensible is the idea of an airport on the Thames estuary?

  • Comment on: Row hits Studio Egret West tower

    Robert Wakeham's comment 20-Jun-2014 10:34 am

    Nothing whatsoever like Parkhill in Sheffield - and hopefully it'll help bring the question of discordant high-rise building to a sensible conclusion.

  • Comment on: BIG scoops contest to design museum for Swiss watch-maker

    Robert Wakeham's comment 16-Jun-2014 8:12 am

    All it needs is a penguin or two.

  • Comment on: The AJ's guide to Brazil's World Cup stadiums

    Robert Wakeham's comment 13-Jun-2014 9:26 am

    I hope that none of these stadiums ever find an alternative use in the way that Chile's national stadium was used by Augusto Pinochet.

  • Comment on: Buckley Gray Yeoman bags Southwark office victory

    Robert Wakeham's comment 9-Jun-2014 9:02 pm

    An interesting interpretation of 'landmark' - not much more than just an apparently fairly slick re-imaging of the existing building, whereas the ORMS scheme appears to respond to a very different brief, presumably a good deal more costly but also a good deal more of a 'landmark'. - I wonder what the AHMM proposal looked like?

  • Comment on: Glasgow George Square report 'a whitewash of a shambles'

    Robert Wakeham's comment 6-Jun-2014 9:46 am

    'Officers working on the project didn't identify any issues relating to elected members' English translation: Nae cooncil staff welshed on their boss. I wonder why - 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil'? The last Glasgow council boss seemed to benefit from this 'code of practice' - until he landed in rehab and the whole mucky story of his regime suddenly exploded in the media.

  • Comment on: Architects and engineers behind RMC HQ rally on listing bid

    Robert Wakeham's comment 4-Jun-2014 9:34 am

    I could have sworn that the building regulations have - in recent decades - increasingly embodied the need for energy conservation, carbon neutrality, sustainability, etc etc, to help ensure that this planet remains habitable for as long as possible. And yet there's really nothing to stop a very attractive, energy efficient, well-built, pioneering modern office building from being flattened to realise the perceived real estate value of the site. It's surely very difficult to ignore the fact that Barton Willmore should be ashamed of themselves for taking on this commission, but unfortunately they're just following in the footsteps of other 'good' architects who, in recent years have collaborated in the destruction of sometimes excellent modern buildings because there's money to be made from redevelopment, and to hell with the sustainability etc that the profession might be expected to respect these days.

  • Comment on: Palestinian architects call on Hodder not to back down on Israeli motion

    Robert Wakeham's comment 4-Jun-2014 9:12 am

    This saga reminds me of some of the pieces by Robert Fisk, in the Independent, over the years, on the obstacles sometimes placed in his way in the course of trying to comment objectively on the less attractive aspects of Israeli behaviour in the conflicts over land and human rights.

  • Comment on: Foster renews plea for £15bn Thames Estuary hub airport

    Robert Wakeham's comment 28-May-2014 9:10 am

    Foster shouldn't confuse London with Britain - the location might well be convenient for London, but that's not the same as being convenient for Britain.

  • Comment on: What went wrong at Oxley Woods?

    Robert Wakeham's comment 18-May-2014 12:09 pm

    RSHP's comment that 'The design of Oxley Woods was inspected and approved by the NHBC...' leaves me wondering if they approved the detailed design 'as built', whether they inspected the work under construction - whether it was built in accordance with the details that they'd approved.

  • Comment on: Report exposes full extent of defects at RSHP’s Oxley Woods

    Robert Wakeham's comment 15-May-2014 8:08 pm

    Not enough information, perhaps due to ongoing responsibility issues, but it's important to know whether it's to do with site supervision, whether there's a material or systems failure involved - or whether it's down to a combination of factors. Uncertainty as to the cause could result in avoidable disruption of efforts to speed up the provision of value-for-money housing when it's desperately needed.

  • Comment on: C20 Society fails in bid to list Euston Station

    Robert Wakeham's comment 14-May-2014 8:34 am

    Travelling through Euston station and forecourt certainly doesn't 'lift the heart', and to me it has a distinctly drab, communist-era East European feel to it.

  • Comment on: Glasgow School of Art by Steven Holl

    Robert Wakeham's comment 9-May-2014 10:24 am

    A breath of fresh air. And the building doesn't seem to be riding on fashion - like the current vogue for twisted, bent and deformed 'look at me' towers in London, so very eloquent in their symbolism of the age of the dodgy 'financial services' culture. There's 'gallus' and there's crude, lumpen, late 20th century banality - like the apartment blocks flanking the tracks on the approach to Waterloo, and the assemblage of junk dominating the approach to Leeds Central from the southwest - monuments to extraordinary philistinism.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters