david hingamp's Comments
1. She supported the retention of capital punishment 2. She destroyed the country's manufacturing industry 3. She voted against the relaxation of divorce laws 4. She abolished free milk for schoolchildren ("Margaret Thatcher, Milk Snatcher") 5. She supported more freedom for business (and look how that turned out) 6. She gained support from the National Front in the 1979 election by pandering to the fears of immigration 7. She gerrymandered local authorities by forcing through council house sales, at the same time preventing councils from spending the money they got for selling houses on building new houses (spending on social housing dropped by 67% in her premiership) 8. She was responsible for 3.6 million unemployed - the highest figure and the highest proportion of the workforce in history and three times the previous government. Massaging of the figures means that the figure was closer to 5 million 9. She ignored intelligence about Argentinian preparations for the invasion of the Falkland Islands and scrapped the only Royal Navy presence in the islands 10. The poll tax 11. She presided over the closure of 150 coal mines; we are now crippled by the cost of energy, having to import expensive coal from abroad 12. She compared her "fight" against the miners to the Falklands War 13. She privatised state monopolies and created the corporate greed culture that we've been railing against for the last 5 years 14. She introduced the gradual privatisation of the NHS 15. She introduced financial deregulation in a way that turned city institutions into avaricious money pits 16. She pioneered the unfailing adoration and unquestioning support of the USA 17. She allowed the US to place nuclear missiles on UK soil, under US control 18. Section 28 19. She opposed anti-apartheid sanctions against South Africa and described Nelson Mandela as "that grubby little terrorist" 20. She support the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and sent the SAS to train their soldiers 21. She allowed the US to bomb Libya in 1986, against the wishes of more than 2/3 of the population 22. She opposed the reunification of Germany 23. She invented Quangos 24. She increased VAT from 8% to 17.5% 25. She had the lowest approval rating of any post-war Prime Minister 26. Her post-PM job? Consultant to Philip Morris tobacco at $250,000 a year, plus $50,000 per speech 27. The Al Yamamah contract 28. She opposed the indictment of Chile's General Pinochet 29. Social unrest under her leadership was higher than at any time since the General Strike 30. She presided over interest rates increasing to 15% 31. BSE 32. She presided over 2 million manufacturing job losses in the 79-81 recession 33. She opposed the inclusion of Eire in the Northern Ireland peace process 34. She supported sanctions-busting arms deals with South Africa 35. Cecil Parkinson, Alan Clark, David Mellor, Jeffrey Archer, Jonathan Aitkin 36. Crime rates doubled under Thatcher 37. Black Wednesday – Britain withdraws from the ERM and the pound is devalued. Cost to Britain - £3.5 billion; profit for George Soros - £1 billion 38. Poverty doubled while she opposed a minimum wage 39. She privatised public services, claiming at the time it would increase public ownership. Most are now owned either by foreign governments (EDF) or major investment houses. The profits don’t now accrue to the taxpayer, but to foreign or institutional shareholders. 40. She cut 75% of funding to museums, galleries and other sources of education 41. In the Thatcher years the top 10% of earners received almost 50% of the tax remissions 42. 21.9% inflation
Comment on: KieranTimberlake wins US Embassy project
This is not looking good at all for Battersea ore London. So not inspiring and not bringing anything to the city or its immediate surroundings. Very sad to see that an architecture as poor as this for a very important building. David - London
Comment on: RMJM hires 'Fred the Shred'
Architecture at that level of money, fees and expenses becomes a secondary issue. It's all about business and big money, who's who and how. Rather sad. At least it gives us more reasons and pride to carry on our projects!
I'm a french architect who has set up his practice in London and am tired of hearing the same old complaints and stories about new architecture and the "damage" it does to other buildings. The best buildings in the world have allways changed, altered, adjusted public and private place. What can one expect from change? that it responds to a brief. British are conservative to the bones and that's where the problem lies. United Kingdom hasn't had its own "revolution anglaise" and can't see ahead. D.Hingamp.
I am a Peckham Rye architect and I also have been staring at this building as it's not even in the desirable part of Peckham. Amazing that this quality architecture has come out of this plot opposite some seedy industrial yards. May I say that it is the developer/owner who has also largely to be thanked for such "expensive" tastes.... David Hingamp - architect.
B-52 allright and then what? and by whom? I really hope that south London architects with their particular expertise will have a chance of participating in this regeneration.... David hingamp - SE London architect.
Comment on: House in Lincolnshire by Adrian Watson
Medias are now only interested in having names to publish. Wether it's to do with commercial, artistic or now architecture fields, you can't get published in a book or in a mag. if you haven't got your entry card. "Welcome to the club". David.
Comment on: High Street 2012 public works jobs up for grabs
Well: . I am a very talented architect . I am a "small" practice that struggle through the recession like all the others . I have a keen interest in public spaces . I have experience working on larger public scale projects within well know architectural firms. . I am not lucky enough to turn over £300,000. I guess I'm out. Tower Hamlets will be missing out.
American innovative architecture?? Sorry, did I hear right? Where in this world are the US doing something good? D.
Emerging architects on the contrary have much more to give to thir clients than old grumpy and clearly greedy practices. As long as you have a good team of engineers, I would not worry too much about the technicalities. I'm all for it! David Hingamp.