rory olcayto's Comments
Thank you Walter, for your very thoughtful commentary.
Ian: no - not as yet. Our website has been optimised for your mobile however. And our own research has shown most architects use Apple rather than windows or android tablets.
Comment on: Skyline campaign: Prospects and views
Thank you for your comments Robert. All of our campaigns – Women in Architecture, More Homes Better Homes and now Skyline – argue in favour of raising standards, whether in terms of a fair working environment, a better quality of housing provision, or a more thoughtful approach to building tall. On the whole, I believe most architects, whether in the AJ100 or not, share these aspirations and while there is always more any business can do to improve – and that includes AJ too – it is also reasonable to celebrate success where it occurs, hence our passion for the AJ100 Awards. In any case, a strong critical culture is good for business - more often than not it inspires innovation. As for your comments regarding height – it’s a good one: ultimately it’s all relative – apparently the first use of the term skyscraper was applied to steel framed buildings just 10 stories high. We’ve gone with Peter Murray’s definition however, and the research NLA published for its London’s Growing Up! Exhibition. about planned tall buildings for the capital.
Matt, thank you for your in-depth take on all things Red Road. Fascinating.
not sure i follow your logic Urbanist. could you explain? cheers, rory
click on the link above that says, 'book your places now'
Comment on: Time for Serpentine Pavilion to back Brits
Thomas, that was the point of the pavilion, as I said in my editorial, above. But the rule has been broken - H&dM built the pavilion in 2012 even though they had already built in England (Tate, Laban) so....time to change the rules! Or just scrap it. That said, the Radic scheme has a lovely neo-Neolithic aesthetic!
Ahh John, you are right. He was living in suffolk when he was arrested under suspicion of being a spy. change has been made. Still the point stands!
Hello Sita: thank you for your question. We devised Kiosk for our partners Turkishceramics, although we have many similar programmes that engage with small firms. Recently we have produced charrettes in Glasgow and Birmingham with Philips and Argent, both for smaller firms. We are in the middle of our Small Projects coverage (which awards winners with a cash prize) and have just awarded and celebrated the best young female architects in the Women in Architecture Awards. It is also just a few months since we shortlisted young firms for the Future Reception competition with Derwent. We hope Kiosk will open a wider debate. At the Building Centre this week we have a crit with the mayor’s office, townscape expert Bob Tavenor and Thames Water (Daisy Froud of small (but growing practice) AOC is joining us too) and we are publishing a supplement exploring the designs and the wider public realm debate soon. An exhibition (also at the Building Centre), and designed by our art editor Brad Yendle begins on Friday. We hope you will come along. Of course AJ is dedicated to fostering young talent - it is our lifeblood too - but that shouldn't mean we don't engage with the proven best, like Zaha Hadid, Hopkins et al. PS. Studio Weave, part of the Kiosk programme, are what you might describe as a small practice too. We were delighted to be able to include them.
Hi Michael, happy new year... regardibng youir point: I think this sentence covers it: 'FAT’s buildings, like the writing, are witty, well-crafted and smart. ' cheers! rory