By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Kevan Shaw's Comments

  • Comment on: Revealed: Five practices shortlisted for Mack revamp

    Kevan Shaw's comment 8-Jan-2015 5:07 pm

    I must say I think the AJ headline here is inappropriate and prejudicial. This is not supposed to be a "revamp" but a restoration of a sadly accidentally damaged masterpiece. When it comes to restoration of damaged masterpieces I cannot imagine, for example, that anyone even remotely suggested the total repainting in a different style of Dali's Christ of St John of the Cross when it suffered significant damage in Glasgow some years ago, honestly I cannot think of a modern painter who would have suggested that this should be done or would be appropriate. The Glasgow School of Art was a complete composition albeit done in two stages, of which the library was an essential part. That composition can only be dramatically harmed by an intervention. Indeed would such an intervention have any architectural integrity and worth if it was placed inside the remaining shell? Would this be architecture or merely interior design? I would hope ,with the contribution of the many skilled Scottish craftsmen around today in the same way the original was built by Scottish craftsmen guided by the genius of Mackintosh in the early 20th Century the library and other damaged spaces can be fully restored. The library in its original form could be put back into use without the concern of damaging precious antique pieces of furniture. Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: Malcolm Fraser: 'This is a fertile moment to press for a new future'

    Kevan Shaw's comment 23-Sep-2014 1:16 pm

    Malcolm, Well said , I think you speak clearly for the whole of the supporters of the Yes movement. Sadly it is clear that the agreements between the Westminster parties to present a common "No" front have already completely unraveled and there is now massive infighting to create party advantages, for the Conservatives particularly. In the course of the last few days promises were made to Scottish voters that were key to the results achieved. It is essential that these promises are kept in full and on the agreed timeline. Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: Tell us what independence would really mean for Scottish architects

    Kevan Shaw's comment 29-Aug-2014 11:35 am

    An independent Scottish government will be able to deliver a better public building and housing programme as it has full control of public finance. The Yes campaign has identifed areas of current spending that will be cut enabling higher spends elsewhere, Trident particularly comes to mind in this respect. As Malcolm Fraser states the people who live in Scotland are of a less Conservative mind and more willing to support society as a whole rather than an elite. As an independent country it will be possible to look again at the standing of the architectural profession and at public procurement methods that have been driven by the desires of Westminster to feed big businesses. Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: RIBA moots ‘test of time’ award

    Kevan Shaw's comment 27-Jun-2013 11:04 am

    This is a really great idea. I would also like such a judging process to include a post occupancy evaluation to asses the subjective experience of the building's users. A successful building as to be delivering a good user experience not just a set of numbers and a nice visual appearance. Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: RIBA’s new Plan of Work under fire as A-L stages are scrapped

    Kevan Shaw's comment 16-May-2013 5:20 pm

    As an Architectural Lighting Designer I have found the old plan of work becoming increasingly f=difficult to reconcile with the current project management and procurement methods. We have found ourselves engaged much later than is best value and best input to the project. I think the new plan of work is much better suited to current practice and much easier for us to adopt wholesale. I agree with Rab Bennetts' suggestion that a standardised drawing example set should be developed. We do see very wide variation between different practices as to what is currently submitted at the old Stage C and Stage D. Standardisation makes it much easier for us sub consultants to integrate our services and our fee proposals with the general workflow Sadly the success of this new plan of work is probably more in the hands of project managers than architects in the current climate. We also need to ensure that it is not used to reduce fees for architects and designers. We still need to do do the same quantity of work no mater how the work stages are set out and named. Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: Architects ‘liable for energy performance’

    Kevan Shaw's comment 25-Apr-2013 10:09 am

    As a lighting Design practice KSLD have been proactive in seeking Post Occupancy Evaluation specifically for lighting aspects and human performance and satisfaction rather than focussing on energy use alone. We have come up against brick walls with building owners just not prepared to have their new schemes assessed. There is also a massive reluctance for building owners or occupiers to pay for Post Occupancy Evaluation. Given the current state of the market and downward pressure on fees this is a significant piece of work if it is to be meaningful and cannot be funded by design practices out of their revenue. In respect of our work we have several instances where our carefully considered designs and control schemes have been defeated by building occupants and facilities management organisations through laziness or demanding unnecessary lighting levels and times switched on. Once a building and its services are handed over it is unrealistic for the design team to bear full liability for performance, this has to be directed towards the operators. Post Occupancy Evaluation is a vital part of the design process. This is the feedback that helps us improve and learn from design. Relying as we do now on anecdotal evidence for the most part is not really adequate. On energy issues we are forced to incorporate lots of separate energy monitoring and metering but there seems to be a major lack of incentive for the data available from these to be properly collected and analysed. Kevan Shaw C.Eng, MILP

  • Comment on: Revealed: the six finalists in George Square contest

    Kevan Shaw's comment 10-Jan-2013 10:46 am

    Really exciting to see these competition entries. Is there any way to view the images any larger? It is very difficult to make out what the teams are actually proposing. I am sure most readers would enjoy a good close look at these visuals. A description of each concept would be great too. Loving the umbrellas throughout!

  • Comment on: Shock as RIAS snubs Hadid's Glasgow museum

    Kevan Shaw's comment 29-Mar-2012 10:05 am

    Given the range and quality of the buildings shortlisted this year it is obvious that there is no need to scrabble around to make up numbers. Is it right there should be an automatic assumption that a big name London architect with a big budget project should automatically be shortlisted in a design competition? I am rather glad to see that the jury in Scotland are sufficiently robust to resist such fashion oriented pressure! Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: Familiar Faces

    Kevan Shaw's comment 23-Feb-2012 10:37 am

    I cannot agree more with the sentiments of this article. The Portrait Gallery is a vital part of Ediburgh's make up and provides an incredible insight to the history of Scotland. The re-working by Page\Park has brought the building back to life and beautifully frames the collection. Kevan Shaw

  • Comment on: Paul Morrell: BIM is 'unstoppable'

    Kevan Shaw's comment 25-Jan-2012 10:26 am

    BIM will build a wall in architecture between practices that can afford the very significant costs of implementation and those who cannot. There will also be a project scale where BIM will become mandatory. There will therefore be a point beyond which new and emerging practices cannot get work. It is inevitable that contractors and project managers will demand BIM capability in design teams for lower and lower value projects in the same way that 3D rendered presentations have now become essential for planning applications for projects where the fees can not really sustain this level of design. While BIM can provide benefits of really large scle projects that can afford it it will be a millstone for smaller projects and smaller practices. Kevan Shaw

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters