KSLD is an independent lighting design consultancy with clients across the globe. Established in 1989 we have a long record of successful projects including Arts Centres, Museums and Galleries, Hotels and Restaurants, Commercial and Historic Buildings.
Comment on: RIBA moots ‘test of time’ award
This is a really great idea. I would also like such a judging process to include a post occupancy evaluation to asses the subjective experience of the building's users. A successful building as to be delivering a good user experience not just a set of numbers and a nice visual appearance. Kevan Shaw
As an Architectural Lighting Designer I have found the old plan of work becoming increasingly f=difficult to reconcile with the current project management and procurement methods. We have found ourselves engaged much later than is best value and best input to the project. I think the new plan of work is much better suited to current practice and much easier for us to adopt wholesale. I agree with Rab Bennetts' suggestion that a standardised drawing example set should be developed. We do see very wide variation between different practices as to what is currently submitted at the old Stage C and Stage D. Standardisation makes it much easier for us sub consultants to integrate our services and our fee proposals with the general workflow Sadly the success of this new plan of work is probably more in the hands of project managers than architects in the current climate. We also need to ensure that it is not used to reduce fees for architects and designers. We still need to do do the same quantity of work no mater how the work stages are set out and named. Kevan Shaw
Comment on: Architects ‘liable for energy performance’
As a lighting Design practice KSLD have been proactive in seeking Post Occupancy Evaluation specifically for lighting aspects and human performance and satisfaction rather than focussing on energy use alone. We have come up against brick walls with building owners just not prepared to have their new schemes assessed. There is also a massive reluctance for building owners or occupiers to pay for Post Occupancy Evaluation. Given the current state of the market and downward pressure on fees this is a significant piece of work if it is to be meaningful and cannot be funded by design practices out of their revenue. In respect of our work we have several instances where our carefully considered designs and control schemes have been defeated by building occupants and facilities management organisations through laziness or demanding unnecessary lighting levels and times switched on. Once a building and its services are handed over it is unrealistic for the design team to bear full liability for performance, this has to be directed towards the operators. Post Occupancy Evaluation is a vital part of the design process. This is the feedback that helps us improve and learn from design. Relying as we do now on anecdotal evidence for the most part is not really adequate. On energy issues we are forced to incorporate lots of separate energy monitoring and metering but there seems to be a major lack of incentive for the data available from these to be properly collected and analysed. Kevan Shaw C.Eng, MILP
Really exciting to see these competition entries. Is there any way to view the images any larger? It is very difficult to make out what the teams are actually proposing. I am sure most readers would enjoy a good close look at these visuals. A description of each concept would be great too. Loving the umbrellas throughout!
Comment on: Shock as RIAS snubs Hadid's Glasgow museum
Given the range and quality of the buildings shortlisted this year it is obvious that there is no need to scrabble around to make up numbers. Is it right there should be an automatic assumption that a big name London architect with a big budget project should automatically be shortlisted in a design competition? I am rather glad to see that the jury in Scotland are sufficiently robust to resist such fashion oriented pressure! Kevan Shaw