By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




With reference to Craig Douglas' letter and Isabel Allen's editorial, both in AJ 01.02.07, concerning CABE 'decreeing that architects serving on its design panel should not be expect to be paid', I wish to point out a significant yet often unrecognised fact quite unrelated to any cheapening, perceived or otherwise, of the industry and those qualified to work within it.

Simply put, many professional indemnity (PI) policies are only valid where work has occurred for remuneration. No remuneration equals no cover.

This type of policy is old fashioned and in the process of being phased out, but architects should be aware that there are still a number of policies out there that include this wording.

I would strongly urge all architects to refer to their policy wording to check their level of cover before embarking on any 'free' work. If in any doubt, contact a specialist PI broker for help and advice.

Ted Jones, head of architects' PI team, Howden Insurance Brokers

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters