By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




One of my regular correspondents writes, 'you must have a look at The image on the homepage is just so depressing. What is really odd is that when you look through the images of the work, it is all so much better than this.

It's as if some genius has decided that it would be a really good idea to pick the very worst image and put it on the homepage. Maybe they have too much work?'

Well, I hope so, because this keynote image is indeed dour. It is a night shot with very few lights on. Recently I've seen quite a few architectural night shots kicking around. You can just hear the conversation round the CAD screen: 'Jeez, that's really lame. Let's get the perspective people to do it over as a night shot.' Also, the site text bangs on about design excellence.

Inappropriate memories of football thugs cranking out 'We are the greatest' come fitfully to mind.

Really, I think it's the site that's inappropriate. You insult your site visitors if you assume they can't make up their own minds about how good your design is. Actually they probably already have.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters