Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

West Pier restoration sparks Chain reaction

  • Comment
Letters

Mike Hymas' letter (AJ 19.2.04) states that a new pier to replace the now destroyed West Pier in Brighton 'misses the point.

Brighton does not need another pier and on its own it is unlikely that it would attract investment.'

How then, as he argues, will a restored West Pier, with its ballroom and tea-drinking, financially justify these restoration costs?

It would also be interesting to define Mr Hymas' term 'restored'. Although many of the original fixtures and fittings have been saved, the pier would essentially be new-build, albeit in a replica style, which questions the validity of it as 'a very historic project of international significance', and more of a thinly veiled case of resurrecting a missed scheme.

It is interesting that they have not championed the cause of restoring the Chain Pier, destroyed so many years ago.

Would it not be more appropriate for the interior fittings and fixtures to be reassembled within the existing Brighton Museum, or a new-build extension to replicate the original interior of the pier?

Messrs Lomax Cassidy & Edwards could perhaps get the chance to finally provide their 'scheme backed by a very competent local team, and the local community'.

Corin Morton, London

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.