Vetting the future for architects
The surreal nature of educational pigeon-holing was revealed in all its glory last month. Education minister Kim Howells drew an important distinction between students training to be dentists and doctors, and those seeking to become vets and architects. The former category should have their fifth-year tuition fees paid by the taxpayer because they are entering the public sector (allegedly). The latter, by contrast, are going into wicked private practice, and therefore the capitalist ...
GET INSTANT ACCESS
for less than 46p a day
Join thousands of professionals who already subscribe to the Architects' Journal.
You’ll get instant access to read this article -
and 53,000+ articles like it.
- Trusted industry news & analysis, wherever you need itUnlimited online access and weekly magazine delivery – now also available on iPad/iPhone
- Get ideas, get inside buildings and check precedentsBuildings Library – images, drawings and plans for exemplar projects in British architecture
- Planning & regulation – what you need to know Protect your practice - the AJ keeps you up-to-date with changes to regulations and legislation