Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

TO STAKE A PATRIOTIC CLAIM ON ARCHITECTURAL MODESTY IS HIGHLY PRESUMPTUOUS

  • Comment
EDITORIAL

In this month's Architectural Review, the AR's diarist Peter Cook writes: 'I watch amused as our sister magazine, The Architects' Journal, nails its colours to the mast of the English ficontemplative-whisper-modesty-brickfl school.'

Right on cue, this week's AJ focuses on Studio Downie's building for the Cass Foundation: a thoughtful, unassuming work which, while not actually made from brick, in spirit at least, clearly comes under the category of 'contemplative-whisper-modesty-brick'.

Andrew Mead, in his review of the building, explicitly locates it within the English landscape tradition; not the ostentatious drive to command the landscape favoured by the more bombastic of our ancestors, but its more subtle counterpart, the search for an architecture that takes its cues from the specifics of the surrounding landscape. It is an argument that supports Cook's characterisation of this particular genre as 'English' but casts doubt on his dismissive assertion that it may serve a purpose, but only 'in the great tradition of minor European regionalist pockets'.

The quest for quiet elegance, for an understated symbiosis with nature, is rooted in English history. It harks back to a period when English architecture was at its least parochial: when it was pioneering an approach that was to have a profound inuence not only in Europe but throughout the world. The same sensibility is evident in, say, Gunnar Asplund's woodland cemetery in Stockholm, or Alvar Aalto's careful reading of the Finnish landscape, or lvaro Siza's Matosinhos swimming pool. If each of these can be described as belonging to a 'regionalist pocket', together they form part of a distinct approach which has proved to be universal in its appeal and has stood the test of time. To stake a patriotic claim on this particular brand of architectural modesty is presumptuous in the extreme; it owes as much to Asplund or Aalto or Siza as it does to Uvedale Price.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.