Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

THE CORPORATION'S MAJOR OBJECTIONS TO THE MAYOR'S PLANS

  • Comment

The new protected vistas to St Paul's are unnecessary and confusing and the views are already well-protected by the St Paul's Heights policy.

The proposed reduction to the width of protection given to existing strategic views of St Paul's is excessive.

The use of backdrop advisory lines that consider individual views in isolation and do not take account of the interaction between different view protection policies is inappropriate.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.