By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




I have been encouraged by recent letters criticising the choice of building studies featured in the AJ.

A journal should report schemes of the highest architectural quality in terms of commodity, firmness, delight and context, that will inform and inspire the reader.

I fear the change of format has inuenced an editorial approach more suited to a magazine than a professional journal.

Richard Baker, Winchester THE LITTLE MAN WILLIAMS CREATES A BIG LAUGH Goodness, doesn't Richard Horden take Jan Kaplicky very seriously (AJ letters 09.11.06). I thought 'little man' Austin Williams' review of the new Future Systems book was very funny and well written. In fact, most of the office could be heard laughing out loud when they opened their copy. So it was far from a whole page wasted. Moreover, I suspect from his own letter that Kaplicky is an architect who lacks real confidence.

By the way, keep sending us the AJ. The emphasis on showcasing innovative small projects that have lots of ideas but little money, like NORD's Eastend Sawmills or the Tolladine Centre, is very refreshing.

Alan Dunlop, Gordon Murray + Alan Dunlop Architects

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters