By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




How cheering that you have seen through the hype that requires us to welcome any would-be 'icon' churned out by a signature architect, and tellingly pointed out both the mediocrity of Herzog & de Meuron's design for enlarging Tate Modern and the inconsistency of Sir Nicholas Serota in promoting it (AJ 27.07.06).

I had welcomed the original conversion of Bankside Power Station, as it (largely) retained Gilbert Scott's 'temple of power' - even though the Swiss architects chosen for the work had neither understanding of nor respect for his monumental brick architecture. But you did not mention that if the plans for the gratuitous ziggurat are endorsed as expected, we will lose yet more of Bankside, as the extension replaces over half of Gilbert Scott's symmetrical south elevation - including its central entrance.

Insensitivity and ineptitude, or more egomaniacal vandalism?

Gavin Stamp, by email

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters