By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




Virtual Internet world Second Life was billed as a major feature of the recent Architecture Week. I remained loftily uninterested, partly from laziness and fear of having to listen to a lot of selfindulgent rant, and partly from serious early disillusionment.

Getting involved in Second Life requires a total suspension of belief in all you ever believed about design, because, aiming for a global audience, Second Life has gone for a very low quality of detail. It's crude, clunky, early Lara Croft. As it's orthogonal, it's fine for pure Miesians, crap for curvy Zahaists.

Take a peep at the movie 'Mies on Architecture Island' at http: //tinyurl. com/ 2ly3na. A black soutaneclad figure leads you to a representation of the Farnsworth House and then shows you around its interior.

Fine. But dive into Second Life itself and it's the usual old dross - rather like what Jackie Craven at About. com calls the architecture of McMansion: 'large, showy Neo-eclectic? built without the guidance of an architect, with poorly proportioned and placed windows and doors? quickly constructed using mix-andmatch details from a builder's catalog' (http: // Second Life architecture exactly.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters