By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Round two


Eden's story didn't quite come to a conclusion when Ball reached an outof-court settlement over a multimillion-pound lawsuit he brought in respect of his removal from the project.

Confidentiality clauses precluded details of the settlement being discussed, but it is known that it was on the basis of 'reinstatement' not reward, ie a settlement in respect of what he had put in rather than what he might have received. That bit of the story is now being played out in another legal action, brought by Ball against the solicitor Druces and Attlee, which worked for Ball and Smit before switching to acting for the Eden trust. Ball claims their actions resulted in him losing substantial sums. Hilariously, in 2001, the solicitor was injuncted from acting for the trust and Smit in the dispute with Ball, because it had at one time acted for Ball and Smit. As ever, Astragal wishes Ball every success.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters