By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


RCA extension should not be treated lightly

Astragal cannot get away with his flippant comment (AJ 16.1.03) that objections to Grimshaw's proposed extension to the Royal College of Art from its original architect, Jim Cadbury Brown and others (including the Twentieth Century Society and Docomomo), simply help 'keep the world going round'.

Rather, the proposal shows the enormous gulf between those such as Grimshaw, who see themselves as Modern architects today (and wear Corb-style glasses to prove it) and those such as Cadbury Brown who, among other things, knew and worked with Corb on CIAM, and feel the essence of Modern architecture lies in its exploitation of space.

Space was Modern architecture's contribution to humanity.

Grimshaw's object will destroy the RCA's space - and the space around the Albert Hall, one of the most important civic groupings in this country. As an institution, the RCA should know better.

James Dunnett, joint chair, Docomomo UK

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters