By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




Your article on Edinburgh council leader Jenny Dawe's comments on architecture (AJ 31.05.07) is based on the assumption that innovation, risky design or radical buildings are the only way to be modern or progressive, and that to do anything else will inevitably bring about mediocre or lacklustre architecture.

This piece of nonsensical Modernist dogma is accompanied by the ridiculous and unsubstantiated assumption that it is only with such out-of-context buildings that Edinburgh can become 'a progressive, business-orientated metropolis'.

It seems that if an elected politician dare express the rather widely held and reasonable view that it is possible to create good contextual buildings in traditional materials that respect and enhance historical character of a place, they are immediately savaged by a profession which is hell-bent on doing just what its discredited avant-garde theory says it should do - and sod the public or any historic place that stands in its way.

Robert Adam, Robert Adam Architects

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters