Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Opposing views

  • Comment

Has Richard Rogers really fallen out with CABE over Renzo Piano's London Bridge Tower proposal, as some excitable scribes seem to think?

Well, yes and no. It is certainly the case that he supported the tower 110 per cent at the inquiry, describing it as one of the greatest designs he had ever seen. And it is true that he applied pressure to CABE to drop its opposition to aspects of the scheme. On the other hand, as my old friend Paul Finch made clear during a two-and-a-half hour cross-examination at the inquiry by counsel for both English Heritage and developer Irvine Sellar, CABE also supports the scheme in terms of location, design and height. Finch recalled a visit by CABE commissioners to the Tower of London to see what impact the LBT might have on the World Heritage site. 'We spoke to a senior beefeater who said he could not see what all the fuss was about.We regarded a beefeater as a significant stakeholder' (laughter). He disputed the EH claim that important views would be ruined, and suggested that visits to view the panorama from, say Primrose Hill, could be meaningless, since it involved imagining what the impact would be without being able to test that opinion. The inspector thought a visit could be useful armed with visualisations, which Finch accepted. But even though CABE would give the tower seven or eight out of 10 as a design, its less-than-complete support had therefore made it a technical objector, because some vital public realm work that has been undertaken by Piano has not been included in the inquiry application. Curious fact: there is no planning inquiry rule which says you have to be a supporter or objector - it is the lawyers who like to keep things black and white.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.