Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Neglect of urban space leads to mistakes

  • Comment
letters

Kenneth Powell questions the connection between Modern Movement urbanism and the ideals of the Garden City planners (AJ 29.5.03).

Did Le Corbusier not refer to his vision of the city as the 'citéjardin verticale'? Powell may not like Modern Movement urbanism, but according to your profile of Oscar Niemeyer (21.5.03) it is 'newly fashionable'. If so, let us hope it leads to a rediscovery of urban space.Neglect of it leads to mistakes, as I believe it has at the Royal College of Art. However elegant Grimshaw's proposed extension may be, its impact on the space around it and on the RCA building, whose value Powell recognises, would be very damaging.

His contention that covered public spaces (shopping arcades? ) proposed for the Heron Tower and Rogers' Leadenhall Street tower are equivalent to the landscaped open spaces proposed by the Modern Movement does not wash with me.

As regards Norman Shaw's Albert Hall Mansions, this was precisely the precedent recognised by Cadbury Brown when he concentrated accommodation in the RCA's Darwin Block, setting up a symmetry about the Albert Hall that Grimshaw's block would destroy.

James Dunnett, co-chair, Docomomo UK

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.