By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Motion question


The Architecture Club broke with convention last week by lifting the Chatham House Rules which dictate that its proceedings cannot be reported in the press, in deference to the fact that AJ editor Isabel Allen was in the chair. The debate, which took place at London's Royal Automobile Club, asked whether architecture is being sidelined in this age of PPP, D&B, PM, CM, PFI and branding, and asked how architects should rise to the challenge. Roland Paoletti urged architects to fight to regain a leading role in large construction projects, while Robin Nicholson offered an optimistic view of the future, arguing that grumblers should 'stop whingeing and get on with it'. The advice was manifestly ignored by fellow speaker Richard Murphy, who offered a spirited tirade against PFI, arguing that it works against small projects and that the logical outcome of its rise is that 'we will all end up working for WS Atkins'.

He did, however, concede that PFI can be appropriate for projects where the primary, and arguably only, architectural challenge is to transport matter from A to B - namely, sewage plants.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters