By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

LOW-RISE LONDON IS A LUXURY WE CAN ILL AFFORD

LETTERS

I have long considered the Corporation of London's obsession with protecting the views of St Paul's Cathedral as entirely laudable (AJ 10.11.05), but with the capital's growth continuing seemingly unchecked, tough decisions will have to be made about how inner-city housing and business density can realistically be increased - and mayor Ken Livingstone is absolutely right to look upwards rather than outwards to the future of the city.

St Paul's Cathedral is undoubtedly a great building, but maintaining the sight-lines of this historic masterpiece cannot be done at the expense of checking the sprawl of the capital - a sprawl which is currently threatening to spill over the boundary of the M25 and engulf the whole of the South East in a great swathe of low-density housing and offices, each of them surrounded by postage stamp-sized gardens and 'public' spaces so small as to be rendered completely meaningless for residents.

The Corporation must accept that the price to be paid for London as a financial and economic powerhouse is to consider it as a limited space. Hong Kong and New York, with their natural boundaries, have found out that the only way is up when it comes to growth.

The prospect of a high-rise city may fill today's architects with dread, but I would suggest the alternative is far worse.

Joseph Donahoe, London SW2

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters