By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Lordly views


Little was made of Lord Foster's recent maiden speech in the House of Lords, during a debate on 'design in public services'. His contribution was brief and to the point, and a good example of the benefits of having people in the Lords who know what they are talking about. The chances of a Foster or Rogers standing for election to a reformed second chamber seem remote, and suggest that New Labour has a point in opposing an all-elected chamber. On the other hand, it is disappointing that having had two decades to think about it, all they can come up with is appointment by Tone. Oh well.

Among the other good contributions to the Lords debate was that of Lord Freyberg, who quoted CABE research on the dearth of planning officers with design qualifications, and the Audit Commission report on design quality in schools. Lord Rodgers (ex-Gang of Four and former director-general of the RIBA) warned about the way PFI might 'diminish the design factor in the complicated equation of construction', and made a sensible plea for cross-party agreement on the role of design.

The debate is worth a read and can be found on the Hansard website.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters