By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Let's raise the stakes in global warming debate


Great to know that you are prepared to stand up for rational debate about the orthodoxy of global warming (AJ 29.5.03). It is depressing how few people are prepared to stick their heads above the parapet and question the assumptions of the new green correctness.

I have found that the test to discover if one is debating with the deaf is to ask what rate of return on green expenditure they would accept. The 'it does not have to cost any more' or 'how can you put a cost to life' response are clear messages to change the subject!

The debate is important, even if only because so many people think it is. However, we need to get it past the religious zeal stage (that admittedly has been crucial in bringing it to the table) and on to an intelligent level. Austin Williams' article brought home to me how easy it is for government to leap on the bandwagon, rather than to lead.

Money is a critical component in all building decisions. It is a simple, universally understood and comparable measure which non-experts use every day to make their own decisions. It could even be called democratic.

Dale Jennings, director, ORMS

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters