By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Learning from Newham: uncovering the cracks in PFI

PFI bids, we are told a d nauseam, are judged according to 'best value' as opposed to lowest possible cost. Yet the post-project evaluation report on the Newham Centre for Mental Health says 'the view of the Trust finance director is that the contract as signed provides poor value to the Trust' but tha t 'it is generally accepted as true that the completed building represents very good value for the price paid'.


for less than 46p a day

Join thousands of professionals who already subscribe to the Architects' Journal.
You’ll get instant access to read this article -
and 53,000+ articles like it.

  • Trusted industry news & analysis, wherever you need itUnlimited online access and weekly magazine delivery – now also available on iPad/iPhone
  • Get ideas, get inside buildings and check precedentsBuildings Library – images, drawings and plans for exemplar projects in British architecture
  • Planning & regulation – what you need to know Protect your practice - the AJ keeps you up-to-date with changes to regulations and legislation
The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters