By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




I really can't see what K Pickering's problem with the Kielder Observatory Competition is (AJ letters, 10.11.05).

I've visited Kielder and have to admit I was completely knocked out: James Turrell's Skyspace, Softroom's Belvedere, and Nick Coombe's Minotaur. Each is remarkable and radical and, I believe, they were built on minuscule budgets. The structures are, as Pickering says, 'hard and aggressive', but I found that this quality only complements their rugged landscape setting.

Coming from overseas myself, I appreciate that Kielder has something of a world-class reputation. I disagree with the assertion that Pickering makes - that projects of this quality could have been achieved if architect selection had been limited to those based in Northumberland only.

Wherever the architect for the observatory actually originates from, I have every confidence that the Kielder curatorial team will yet again get their selection absolutely spot on.

Rebecca Hepner, London EC2

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters