By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Jet set


Manhattan is witnessing a wonderful set-piece battle over the proposed new Olympic stadium to be built in a largely residential area (if it goes ahead).

The project involves extending the subway, and supposedly producing a car-free stadium, courtesy of UK environmental engineer Battle McCarthy. But not everyone is convinced the development is a good idea, not least the editor of the Architect's Newspaper, the Manhattan fortnightly launched earlier this year. According to AN, the proposed stadium is a giant real estate deal which will result in development of a group of tower blocks once the floor area ratio of the neighbourhood is changed;

moreover, there will be underground parking for 5,000 cars; and money intended for low cost housing (some $300 million) will be diverted into the scheme by the city authorities. It needs a Tom Wolfe to do justice to this, especially as New York Times critic Herbert Muschamp is set to give up architecture for fresh fields.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters